ReviewMicroscopy research and technique2023
Measuring (biological) materials mechanics with atomic force microscopy. 5. Traction force microscopy (cell traction forces).
Review in Microscopy research and technique, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring (biological) materials mechanics with atomic force microscopy. 5. Traction force microscopy (cell traction forces).Microscopy research and technique · 2023Review
- JEasyTFM: an open-source software package for the analysis of large 2D TFM data within ImageJ.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cells generate traction forces to probe the mechanical properties of the surroundings and maintain a basal equilibrium state of stress. Traction forces are also implicated in cell migration, adhesion and ECM remodeling, and alteration of these forces is often observed in pathologies such as cancer. Thus, analyzing the traction forces is important for studies of cell mechanics in cancer and metastasis. In this primer, the methodology for conducting two-dimensional traction force microscopy (2D-TFM) experiments is reported. As a practical example, we analyzed the traction forces generated by three human breast cancer cell lines of different metastatic potential: MCF10-A, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, and studied the effects of actin cytoskeleton disruption on those traction forces. Contrary to what is often reported in literature, lower traction forces were observed in cells with higher metastatic potential (MDA-MB-231). Implications of substrate stiffness and concentration of extracellular matrix proteins in such findings are discussed in the text. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Traction force microscopy (TFM) is suitable for studying and quantifying cell-substrate and cell-cell forces. TFM is suitable for investigating the relationship between chemical to mechanical signal transduction and vice versa. TFM can be combined with classical indentation studies providing a compact picture of cell mechanics. TFM still needs new physico-chemical (sample preparation) and computational approaches for more accurate data evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.