ArticleTuberkuloz ve toraks2023
[Prognosis of lung cancer patients followed in the intensive care unit: A cross-sectional study].
Article in Tuberkuloz ve toraks, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between albumin-corrected anion gap and in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on the MIMIC database.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Assessing in-hospital mortality risk in ICU lung cancer patients using machine learning: An analysis based on the MIMIC-IV database.PloS one · 2026Article
- [Construction and Clinical Validation of a Risk Early Warning Model for Mechanical Ventilation-Associated Pneumonia in Older Patients With Lung Cancer].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
- Characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with lung cancer admitted to a tertiary care intensive care unit over more than 20 years.Annals of thoracic medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lung cancer is the most common solid organ malignancy requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. For many years, lung cancer patients were not considered in the priority patient category for admission to ICU because of their high mortality rate and poor response to therapy. Considering the developments in treatment modalities, we aimed to reevaluate the prognosis of patients with lung cancer in the ICU. Materials and Methods: Patients characteristics, date of diagnosis, the reason for ICU admission, the stage of cancer, histopathological type, history of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery for cancer, and APACHE-II and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were recorded retrospectively. Result: A total of 100 patients had a mean age of 69.7 ± 9.0 years. Among these patients, 18% had small cell lung cancer, while 82% had non-small cell lung cancer. The in-hospital mortality rate was 69% for all patients, while among those discharged from the ICU, the first 6-month mortality rate was 58.1%. The median survival time was 8.2 months. Advanced age, the need for mechanical ventilation, the need for vasopressors, a high APACHE -II, and the CCI all reduced survival in multivariate analysis, whereas chemotherapy and surgical history improved survival. Conclusions: Patients admitted to the ICU with lung cancer continue to experience a high mortality rate. However, identifying the factors that are associated with survival can be crucial in establishing care plans and prioritizing ICU admission for further therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.