ArticleTuberkuloz ve toraks2023
[Segmentation of acute pulmonary embolism in computed tomography pulmonary angiography using the deep learning method].
Article in Tuberkuloz ve toraks, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D region-growing nnU-Net improves pulmonary embolism detection on CTPA: a dual-cohort validation study.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Advancements in Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in the Radiological Detection of Pulmonary Embolism.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pulmonary embolism is a type of thromboembolism seen in the main pulmonary artery and its branches. This study aimed to diagnose acute pulmonary embolism using the deep learning method in computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and perform the segmentation of pulmonary embolism data. Materials and Methods: The CTPA images of patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism who underwent scheduled imaging were retrospectively evaluated. After data collection, the areas that were diagnosed as embolisms in the axial section images were segmented. The dataset was divided into three parts: training, validation, and testing. The results were calculated by selecting 50% as the cut-off value for the intersection over the union. Result: Images were obtained from 1.550 patients. The mean age of the patients was 64.23 ± 15.45 years. A total of 2.339 axial computed tomography images obtained from the 1.550 patients were used. The PyTorch U-Net was used to train 400 epochs, and the best model, epoch 178, was recorded. In the testing group, the number of true positives was determined as 471, the number of false positives as 35, and 27 cases were not detected. The sensitivity of CTPA segmentation was 0.95, the precision value was 0.93, and the F1 score value was 0.94. The area under the curve value obtained in the receiver operating characteristic analysis was calculated as 0.88. Conclusions: In this study, the deep learning method was successfully employed for the segmentation of acute pulmonary embolism in CTPA, yielding positive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.