Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37345251›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes2023

Rationale and design for the Blood Pressure Control Target in Diabetes (BPROAD) study.

BPROAD Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

BPROAD Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes and hypertension are major modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Previous clinical trials have demonstrated that intensive blood pressure reduction lowers the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality compared to standard blood pressure reduction among patients without diabetes. However, optimal levels of blood pressure control in patients with diabetes remain uncertain.

methodsThe Blood Pressure Control Target in Diabetes (BPROAD) study is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial conducted in mainland China. We plan to enroll 12 702 participants aged ≥50 years with type 2 diabetes, an increased cardiovascular risk, and systolic blood pressure ≥130 mm Hg from 150 study centers. Participants are randomly assigned to intensive (a systolic target of <120 mm Hg) or standard (a systolic target of <140 mm Hg) blood pressure treatment group. Participants will be followed monthly for blood pressure management in the first 3 months and then every 3 months afterward. The primary study outcome is a composite of major cardiovascular events including nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, treated or hospitalized heart failure, and cardiovascular death. Data will be collected every 3 months for up to 5 years and a blinded outcome committee will adjudicate all clinical outcomes. The BPROAD study is designed to have 90% statistical power to detect a 20% reduction in the primary study outcome at a two-sided significance level of 0.05.

conclusionsThe BPROAD study will provide important evidence as to whether intensive blood pressure management has additional benefits on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HypertensionMyocardial InfarctionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHumansMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntihypertensive Agents2型糖尿病blood pressurecardiovascular diseaserandomized controlled trialtype 2 diabetes心血管疾病血压随机对照试验

Identifiers

PMID37345251
PMCPMC10755603
OpenAlexW4381598665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.