ArticleBiophysical journal2023
Characterizing interactions in E-cadherin assemblages.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cadherin intermolecular interactions are critical for cell-cell adhesion and play essential roles in tissue formation and the maintenance of tissue structures. In this study, we focus on E-cadherin, a classical cadherin that connects epithelial cells, to understand how they interact in cis and trans conformations when attached to the same cell or opposing cells. We employ coevolutionary sequence analysis and molecular dynamics simulations to confirm previously known interaction sites as well as to identify new interaction sites. The sequence coevolutionary results yield a surprising result indicating that there are no strongly favored intermolecular interaction sites, which is unusual and suggests that many interaction sites may be possible, with none being strongly preferred over others. By using molecular dynamics, we test the persistence of these interactions and how they facilitate adhesion. We build several types of cadherin assemblages, with different numbers and combinations of cis and trans interfaces to understand how these conformations act to facilitate adhesion. Our results suggest that, in addition to the established interaction sites on the EC1 and EC2 domains, an additional plausible cis interface at the EC3-EC5 domain exists. Furthermore, we identify specific mutations at cis/trans binding sites that impair adhesion within E-cadherin assemblages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.