Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37345220›Full record

ReviewESC heart failure2023

Pressure-strain loops unveil haemodynamics behind mechanical circulatory support systems.

Federico Landra, Giulia Elena Mandoli, Carlotta Sciaccaluga, Guglielmo Gallone, Francesco Bruno, Chiara Fusi, Maria Barilli, Marta Focardi, Luna Cavigli, Flavio D'Ascenzi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Federico LandraDivision of Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2106-0884
Giulia Elena MandoliDivision of Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Carlotta SciaccalugaDivision of Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Guglielmo GalloneDivision of Cardiology, Cittá della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Francesco BrunoDivision of Cardiology, Cittá della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Chiara FusiDivision of Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Maria BarilliDivision of Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Marta FocardiDivision of Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Luna CavigliDivision of Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Flavio D'AscenziDivision of Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Sonia BernazzaliDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Massimo MaccheriniDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Matteo CameliDivision of Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Serafina ValenteDivision of Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
University of Siena · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsMechanical circulatory support (MCS) systems are increasingly employed in cardiogenic shock and advanced heart failure. A thorough understanding of the complex interactions occurring among heart, vasculature, and device is essential to optimize patient's management. The aim of this study is to explore non-invasive haemodynamic profiling of patients undergoing MCS based on pressure-strain (PS) analysis.

methodsClinical and echocardiographic data from consecutive patients undergoing different MCS systems positioning/implantation admitted to the third level cardiological intensive care unit of Siena Hospital from August 2021 to November 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients without a useful echocardiographic exam or without arterial blood pressure recording at the time of echocardiography were excluded. Myocardial work analysis was performed in the included patients.

resultsWe reviewed 18 patients, of which nine were excluded. Included patients were three patients with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), two patients with durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD), two patients with Impella®, one patient with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and one patient with ECMO and IABP. Myocardial work analysis was feasible in each included patient. The use of IABP shifted the PS curve rightward and downward. Global work index (GWI) and global wasted work (GWW) decreased after IABP positioning, whereas global work efficiency (GWE) increased. The use of continuous-flow pumps, whether temporaneous (Impella®) or long term (dLVAD), induced a change in the PS loop morphology, with a shift towards a triangular shape. ECMO positioning alone resulted in a narrowing of the PS loop, with a decrease in GWI and GWE and an increase in GWW and mean arterial pressure. The combined used of IABP with ECMO widened the PS loop and improved GWI and GWE.

conclusionsPS loops analysis in patients undergoing MCS seems to be feasible and may unveil MCS-induced haemodynamic variations. Myocardial work could be used to monitor ventricular-arterial-device coupling and guide tailored MCS management.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureHemodynamicsHumansRetrospective StudiesShock, CardiogenicAdvanced heart failureCardiogenic shockMechanical circulatory supportMyocardial workPressure-strain loopVentricular-arterial coupling

Identifiers

PMID37345220
PMCPMC10375099
OpenAlexW4381599132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.