Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37345172›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Role of AI and Radiomic Markers in Early Diagnosis of Renal Cancer and Clinical Outcome Prediction: A Brief Review.

Mohamed Shehata, Rasha T Abouelkheir, Mallorie Gayhart, Eric Van Bogaert, Mohamed Abou El-Ghar, Amy C Dwyer, Rosemary Ouseph, Jawad Yousaf, Mohammed Ghazal, Sohail Contractor and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. State of the art review of AI in renal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohamed ShehataDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6640-6183
Rasha T AbouelkheirDepartment of Radiology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt.
Mallorie GayhartDepartment of Biology, Berea College, Berea, KY 40292, USA.
Eric Van BogaertDepartment of Radiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Mohamed Abou El-GharDepartment of Radiology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2713-4394
Amy C DwyerKidney Disease Program, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Rosemary OusephKidney Disease Program, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Jawad YousafElectrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering Department, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi 59911, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-7937-3007
Mohammed GhazalElectrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering Department, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi 59911, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-9045-6698
Sohail ContractorDepartment of Radiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Ayman El-BazDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7264-1323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, renal cancer (RC) is the 10th most common cancer among men and women. The new era of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics have allowed the development of AI-based computer-aided diagnostic/prediction (AI-based CAD/CAP) systems, which have shown promise for the diagnosis of RC (i.e., subtyping, grading, and staging) and prediction of clinical outcomes at an early stage. This will absolutely help reduce diagnosis time, enhance diagnostic abilities, reduce invasiveness, and provide guidance for appropriate management procedures to avoid the burden of unresponsive treatment plans. This survey mainly has three primary aims. The first aim is to highlight the most recent technical diagnostic studies developed in the last decade, with their findings and limitations, that have taken the advantages of AI and radiomic markers derived from either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) images to develop AI-based CAD systems for accurate diagnosis of renal tumors at an early stage. The second aim is to highlight the few studies that have utilized AI and radiomic markers, with their findings and limitations, to predict patients' clinical outcome/treatment response, including possible recurrence after treatment, overall survival, and progression-free survival in patients with renal tumors. The promising findings of the aforementioned studies motivated us to highlight the optimal AI-based radiomic makers that are correlated with the diagnosis of renal tumors and prediction/assessment of patients' clinical outcomes. Finally, we conclude with a discussion and possible future avenues for improving diagnostic and treatment prediction performance.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical outcome predictioncomputer-aided diagnostic techniquesradiomic markersrenal cancer

Identifiers

PMID37345172
PMCPMC10216706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.