Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37345167›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Patient's Desire and Real Availability Concerning Supportive Measures Accompanying Radical Prostatectomy: Differences between Certified Prostate Cancer Centers and Non-Certified Centers Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes within the Cross-Sectional Study Improve.

Ingmar Wolff, Martin Burchardt, Julia Peter, Christian Thomas, Danijel Sikic, Christian Fiebig, Sören Promnitz, Bernd Hoschke, Maximilian Burger, Marco J Schnabel and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Ingmar WolffDepartment of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4197-6643
Martin BurchardtDepartment of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.
Julia PeterDepartment of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, 94315 Straubing, Germany.
Christian ThomasDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6511-965X
Danijel SikicDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Christian FiebigDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Sören PromnitzDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder), 15236 Frankfort (Oder), Germany.
Bernd HoschkeDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus, 03048 Cottbus, Germany.
Maximilian BurgerDepartment of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Marco J SchnabelDepartment of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Christian GilfrichDepartment of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, 94315 Straubing, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0211-0636
Niklas LöbigDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Nina N HarkeDepartment of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hanover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6154-7101
Florian A DistlerDepartment of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0457-3888
Matthias MayDepartment of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, 94315 Straubing, Germany.
Barmherzige Brüder Klinikum St. Elisabeth in Straubing · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DECarl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEParacelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certification as a prostate cancer center requires the offer of several supportive measures to patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). However, it remains unclear how patients estimate the relevance of these measures and whether the availability of these measures differs between certified prostate cancer centers (CERTs) and non-certified centers (NCERTs). In 20 German urologic centers, a survey comprising questions on the relevance of 15 supportive measures was sent to 1000 patients at a median of 15 months after RP. Additionally, patients were asked to rate the availability of these measures using a four-item Likert scale. The aim of this study was to compare these ratings between CERTs and NCERTs. The response rate was 75.0%. In total, 480 patients underwent surgery in CERTs, and 270 in NCERTs. Patients rated 6/15 supportive measures as very relevant: preoperative medical counselling concerning treatment options, a preoperative briefing answering last questions, preoperative pelvic floor exercises (PFEs), postoperative PFEs, postoperative social support, and postoperative rehabilitation addressing physical fitness recovery. These ratings showed no significant difference between CERTs and NCERTs (

Indexed as

certified prostate cancer centerspatient-reported outcomeperioperative supportive measuresprostate cancerradical prostatectomysurvey

Identifiers

PMID37345167
PMCPMC10216650
OpenAlexW4377097754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.