ArticleCancers2023
Comparison of Clinical Subtypes of Breast Cancer within the Claudin-Low Molecular Cluster Reveals Distinct Phenotypes.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Redefining breast cancer: therapeutic opportunities in HER2-low and emerging molecular subtypes.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- From mutation to treatment: The dual role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in gynecological malignancy development and management a systematic review.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Review
- Robust Heterogeneity Adjustment for Gaussian Graphical Model With Latent Variables.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Pathological and therapeutic implications of Notch overexpression in claudin-low breast cancers.Human cell · 2026Article
- Taking the 'low' into consideration: Discussions on redefining HER2 status in breast cancer (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Subtype-specific HER3 enrichment in basal-like breast cancer is regulated via the GATA2/GATA3-FOXA1 axis.Cancer letters · 2025Article
- TIE1 Promotes Primary Tumor Growth by Inhibiting Apoptosis and Activating the AKT-p70S6K Signaling Pathway in Breast Cancer.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2025Article
- Single-cell transcriptional atlas of human breast cancers and model systems.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024Article
- Advancements in Solid Lipid Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for Breast Cancer Therapy.Current pharmaceutical design · 2024Review
- Tight Junction Claudins and Occludin Are Differentially Regulated and Expressed in Genomically Defined Subsets of Colon Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Article
- EMT Features in Claudin-Low versus Claudin-Non-Suppressed Breast Cancers and the Role of Epigenetic Modifications.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Article
- Research progress of Claudin-low breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Molecular Characteristics and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities of Claudin-low Breast Cancers Derived from Cell Line Models.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMolecular subtyping of breast cancer has provided a new perspective on the pathogenesis of the disease and a foundation for building a clinical classification for this heterogeneous disease. The initial classification categorizing breast cancers into five groups, luminal A, luminal B, ERBB2-overexpressing, basal-like and normal-like, was later supplemented by an additional group, claudin-low tumors. However, the claudin-low group has been more difficult to align with clinically used immunohistochemical categories. The identity of this group among clinical cases remains ill defined.
methodsThe METABRIC cohort comprising more than 1700 breast cancers and providing information for classifying them in both clinical groups and the genomic PAM50/claudin-low groups was analyzed to derive relationships and clarify potential pathogenic ramifications. Comparisons of the claudin-low cases bearing different clinical group classifications and of the respective cases with the same clinical non-claudin-low classifications were performed.
resultsER-negative/HER2-negative breast cancers are predominantly (88.4%) basal-like and claudin low. Conversely, most basal-like cancers (83.6%) are ER negative/HER2 negative. However, claudin-low breast cancers are only in 68.4% of cases ER negative/HER2 negative and the other clinical phenotypes, mostly ER positive/HER2 negative/low proliferation, are also represented in more than 30% of claudin-low cancers. These claudin-low non-ER-negative/HER2-negative breast cancers differ from claudin-low ER-negative/HER2-negative cases in grade, prevalence of integrative clusters, and prevalence of common mutations and common amplifications. Differences also exist between the two groups classified clinically as ER negative/HER2 negative, that are genomically basal-like or claudin-low, including in menopause status, grade, histology, prevalence of high tumor mutation burden, distribution of integrative clusters, prevalence of
conclusionWithin genomically claudin-low breast cancers, the ER-negative/HER2-negative group is distinct from the group with either ER or HER2 positivity. Conversely, within clinical phenotypes, claudin-low and non-claudin-low breast cancers differ in clinical characteristics and molecular attributes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.