Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37345002›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

The Current Treatment Trends and Survival Patterns in Melanoma Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB): A Multicenter Nationwide Study.

Marcin Ziętek, Paweł Teterycz, Jędrzej Wierzbicki, Michał Jankowski, Manuela Las-Jankowska, Wojciech Zegarski, Janusz Piekarski, Dariusz Nejc, Kamil Drucis, Bożena Cybulska-Stopa and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Marcin ZiętekDepartment of Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7890-3483
Paweł TeteryczDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7304-714X
Jędrzej WierzbickiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, 53-413 Wroclaw, Poland.
Michał JankowskiChair of Surgical Oncology, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Oncology Center-Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Manuela Las-JankowskaChair of Surgical Oncology, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Oncology Center-Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Wojciech ZegarskiChair of Surgical Oncology, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Oncology Center-Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Janusz PiekarskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.
Dariusz NejcDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.
Kamil DrucisDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gdansk Medical University, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7251-3505
Bożena Cybulska-StopaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, 31-115 Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0975-850X
Wojciech ŁobaziewiczDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, 31-115 Cracow, Poland.
Katarzyna Galwas2nd Department of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland.
Grażyna Kamińska-WinciorekDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Onco-Hematology, Skin Cancer and Melanoma Team, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9810-4945
Marcin ZdzienickiDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Tatsiana SryukinaDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Anna ZiobroDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka KluzDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Anna M CzarneckaDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2107-3810
Piotr RutkowskiDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8920-5429
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PLCopernicus Memorial Hospital · PLGdańsk Medical University · PLLublin Oncology Center · PLMedical University of Lodz · PLWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education KB-289/2022 - SUBZ.C280.21.023Ministry of Science and Higher Education SUBZ.C280.23.074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn melanoma treatment, an approach following positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been recently deescalated from completion lymph node dissection (CLND) to active surveillance based on phase III trials data. In this study, we aim to evaluate treatment strategies in SLNB-positive melanoma patients in real-world practice.

methodsFive-hundred-fifty-seven melanoma SLNB-positive patients from seven comprehensive cancer centers treated between 2017 and 2021 were included. Kaplan-Meier methods and the Cox Proportional-Hazards Model were used for analysis.

resultsThe median follow-up was 25 months. Between 2017 and 2021, the percentage of patients undergoing CLND decreased (88-41%), while the use of adjuvant treatment increased (11-51%). The 3-year OS and RFS rates were 77.9% and 59.6%, respectively. Adjuvant therapy prolonged RFS (HR:0.69,

conclusionsTreatment of SLNB-positive melanoma patients is constantly evolving, and the role of surgery is currently rather limited. Whether CLND has been performed or not, in a group of SLNB-positive patients, adjuvant systemic treatment should be offered to all eligible patients.

Indexed as

active surveillanceadjuvant systemic treatmentcompletion lymph node dissectionmelanomasentinel lymph nodes biopsy

Identifiers

PMID37345002
PMCPMC10216007
OpenAlexW4375949934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.