ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2023
Finite-element simulation of in-plane tear propagation in the dissected aorta: Implications for the propagation mechanism.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A three-dimensional computational study of critical pressures of dissection propagation in the aorta.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental andProgress in materials science · 2025Article
- Finite-element simulation of in-plane tear propagation in the dissected aorta: Implications for the propagation mechanism.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computer modeling and numerical simulation are essential for understanding the progression of aortic dissection. However, tear propagation has not been properly modeled and simulated. The in-plane dissection propagation between concentrically distributed elastic lamellae is modeled using the cohesive zone method with a bilinear traction-separation law. The parameters of cohesive elements are calibrated for the three modes of interfacial damage in the media, enabling quantitative predictions of in-plane tear propagation. An idealized cylindrical tube-shaped bilayer thick-wall model of the aorta is employed to elucidate the influence of geometrical parameters, loading conditions and residual stress on the tear propagation. While the model is capable of replicating that deeper, larger tears are associated with lower critical pressure, new findings include: (i) Larger axial stretch leads to lower critical pressure; (ii) Increased magnitude of residual stress is associated with higher critical pressure; (iii) Pressure difference between true and false lumen alters the critical pressure; (iv) The interfacial damage is mostly opening mode in the axial direction, but shear-dominated in the circumferential direction; (v) Damage due to the opening mode is associated with smaller fracture energy, which makes it easier to propagate than the shear and the mixed modes. (vi) The deformed shape of the tear, which is related to its geometrical features and loading conditions, modulates the critical pressure via two pathways: (a) deformed shapes are associated with specific modes of damage, which influences the critical pressure, and (b) deformed shapes modulate the critical pressure directly via geometrical constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.