Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37344890›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2023

Perception, practices, and understanding related to teenage pregnancy among the adolescent girls in India: a scoping review.

Arpita Panda, Jayashree Parida, Susangita Jena, Abinash Pradhan, Sanghamitra Pati, Harpreet Kaur, Subhendu Kumar Acharya

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arpita PandaICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, NALCO Nagar, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751023, India.
Jayashree ParidaICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, NALCO Nagar, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751023, India.
Susangita JenaICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, NALCO Nagar, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751023, India.
Abinash PradhanICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, NALCO Nagar, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751023, India.
Sanghamitra PatiICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, NALCO Nagar, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751023, India.
Harpreet KaurDivision of Epidemiology and Communicable Diseases (ECD-Tribal Health), ICMR Head Quarters, New Delhi, India.
Subhendu Kumar AcharyaICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, NALCO Nagar, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751023, India. a.subhendu@gmail.com.
Regional Medical Research Center · INNational Institute for Research in Tribal Health · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeenage pregnancy is a concerning public health problem in India. Misperception and misunderstanding about pregnancy and its preventive methods lead to pregnancy when adolescents are involved in unsafe sexual intercourse. This scoping review aims to discuss the evidence on the perception, practices, and understanding related to teenage pregnancy among adolescent girls in the Indian context.

methodThe Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework and Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual were used for the scoping review. The Population, Concept, and Context strategy (PCC) ensured the review questions, eligibility criteria, and search strategy. The Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) was used. A literature search was done using electronic databases by specific keywords such as "teenage", "adolescences", "pregnancy", "perception", "knowledge", "awareness", etc. Relevant grey literature was identified through further searching. The review included studies that fulfil inclusion criteria having female adolescent groups aged from 10 to 19 years in the Indian context between the years 2000 and 2021.

resultWe found 40 eligible studies; more than half of these were from southern (35%) and northern (27.5%) regions, and studies from the rest of India were very sporadically distributed. Most studies (72.5%) were published in the last 10 years. The relevant extracted data from individual studies were synthesized and presented in the two major sections, perception, practices, and the second one, understanding and experiences among teenage girls. The understanding of pregnancy and teenage pregnancy-related preventive methods was detailed analysis in about 72% of papers whereas other aspects, such as perception (22.5%), practices (25%), and experiences (7.5%) were discussed in the remaining papers related to pregnancy among adolescent girls.

conclusionEvidence in the selected studies shows that understanding and practices are the major areas that were primarily explored, where perception, practices and experiences are the topics that are relatively less investigated. Literature synthesis derives misconception, lack of understanding, and practices without knowing the consequences are the key factors responsible for early pregnancies. Future interventions like increasing awareness, providing comprehensive reproductive knowledge, convenient health care aids, and proper counselling are adequate measures for minimalising the problem. The present analysis showed that studies are limited in their scope concerning various aspects of teenage pregnancy in India, so this scoping review gives essential perspectives on future research and implementation plans and policies in this field.

Indexed as

Pregnancy in AdolescenceAdolescentChildFemaleHumansIndiaPregnancyYoung AdultAbortionAdolescent girlsContraceptive useIndiaPerceptionsPracticesPregnancyTeenager

Identifiers

PMID37344890
PMCPMC10283331
OpenAlexW4381598076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.