Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37344848›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2023

A simplified method to correct saturation of arterial input function for cardiac magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion imaging: validation with simultaneously acquired PET.

Ran Li, Masoud Edalati, David Muccigrosso, Jeffrey M C Lau, Richard Laforest, Pamela K Woodard, Jie Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ran LiMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4525 Scott Ave, Room 3114, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Masoud EdalatiMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4525 Scott Ave, Room 3114, St. Louis, MO, USA.
David MuccigrossoMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4525 Scott Ave, Room 3114, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jeffrey M C LauDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Richard LaforestMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4525 Scott Ave, Room 3114, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Pamela K WoodardMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4525 Scott Ave, Room 3114, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jie ZhengMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4525 Scott Ave, Room 3114, St. Louis, MO, USA. zhengj@mir.wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2310-2996
Mallinckrodt (United States) · USNational Heart Centre Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFirst-pass perfusion imaging in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an established method to measure myocardial blood flow (MBF). An obstacle for accurate quantification of MBF is the saturation of blood pool signal intensity used for arterial input function (AIF). The objective of this project was to validate a new simplified method for AIF estimation obtained from single-bolus and single sequence perfusion measurements. The reference MBF was measured simultaneously on

methodsSixteen patients with clinically confirmed myocardial ischemia were imaged in a clinical whole-body PET-MRI system. PET perfusion imaging was performed in a 10-min acquisition after the injection of 10 mCi of

resultsOverall, there were 256 segments in 16 patients, mean resting perfusion for PET was 1.06 ± 0.34 ml/min/g and 1.04 ± 0.30 ml/min/g for MRI (P = 0.05), whereas mean stress perfusion for PET was 2.00 ± 0.74 ml/min/g and 2.12 ± 0.76 ml/min/g for MRI (P < 0.01). Linear regression analysis in MBF revealed strong correlation (r = 0.91, slope = 0.96, P < 0.001) between PET and MRI. Myocardial perfusion reserve, calculated from the ratio of stress MBF over resting MBF, also showed a strong correlation between MRI and PET measurements (r = 0.82, slope = 0.81, P < 0.001).

conclusionThe results demonstrated the feasibility of the simplified AIF estimation method for the accurate quantification of MBF by MRI with single sequence and single contrast injection. The MRI MBF correlated strongly with PET MBF obtained simultaneously. This post-processing technique will allow easy transformation of clinical perfusion imaging data into quantitative information.

Indexed as

AmmoniaMyocardial Perfusion ImagingCoronary CirculationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPerfusionPositron-Emission TomographyPredictive Value of TestsAmmoniaArterial input functionCardiac magnetic resonanceMyocardial blood flowMyocardial flow reserveVasodilation

Identifiers

PMID37344848
PMCPMC10286396
OpenAlexW4381548702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.