ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023
Novel models by machine learning to predict prognosis of breast cancer brain metastases.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed.
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting febrile seizures following enterovirus infection in children.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Development and external validation of an XGBoost-based prognostic model for small cell lung cancer with brain metastases.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of survival in breast cancer patients with lung metastasis: a SEER-based study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Integrated Transcriptomic Analyses Identify Four Prognosis-Associated Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of an XGBoost-based prognostic prediction model and risk stratification system for overall survival in pediatric neuroblastoma: a SEER-based study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Differences in distant metastasis risk of breast cancer originating from various primary sites: a retrospective analysis based on the SEER database.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cancer-specific survival patterns in patients with bone metastasis: a registry-based analysis of 13,742 patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The relationship between urinary tract infections and sepsis: results from Mendelian randomization and MIMIC data study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Biological aging enhances prognostic stratification beyond chronological age in breast cancer brain metastases.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Current Understanding and Future Directions.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prognostic modeling and surgical value analysis of de novo metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting brain metastasis in breast cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for stage IV breast cancer based on primary tumor resection with machine learning methods: retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence improves risk stratification for breast cancer recurrence and mortality in women exposed to pesticides: a call for reassessment of stratification criteria.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Multiomics analysis and prognostic modeling reveal the molecular features and potential therapeutic targets of breast cancer brain metastasis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prognostic model for metastatic breast cancer and its interpretability: a multicenter retrospective study.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Nomogram for survival prediction in metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer and survival comparison between systemic chemotherapy and local radiotherapy in high-risk patients.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Development of machine learning-based prognostic models for small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: an analysis of SEER and Chinese populations.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) are the most fatal, with limited survival in all breast cancer distant metastases. These patients are deemed to be incurable. Thus, survival time is their foremost concern. However, there is a lack of accurate prediction models in the clinic. What's more, primary surgery for BCBM patients is still controversial.
methodsThe data used for analysis in this study was obtained from the SEER database (2010-2019). We made a COX regression analysis to identify prognostic factors of BCBM patients. Through cross-validation, we constructed XGBoost models to predict survival in patients with BCBM. Meanwhile, a BCBM cohort from our hospital was used to validate our models. We also investigated the prognosis of patients treated with surgery or not, using propensity score matching and K-M survival analysis. Our results were further validated by subgroup COX analysis in patients with different molecular subtypes.
resultsThe XGBoost models we created had high precision and correctness, and they were the most accurate models to predict the survival of BCBM patients (6-month AUC = 0.824, 1-year AUC = 0.813, 2-year AUC = 0.800 and 3-year survival AUC = 0.803). Moreover, the models still exhibited good performance in an externally independent dataset (6-month: AUC = 0.820; 1-year: AUC = 0.732; 2-year: AUC = 0.795; 3-year: AUC = 0.936). Then we used Shiny-Web tool to make our models be easily used from website. Interestingly, we found that the BCBM patients with an annual income of over USD$70,000 had better BCSS (HR = 0.523, 95%CI 0.273-0.999, P < 0.05) than those with less than USD$40,000. The results showed that in all distant metastasis sites, only lung metastasis was an independent poor prognostic factor for patients with BCBM (OS: HR = 1.606, 95%CI 1.157-2.230, P < 0.01; BCSS: HR = 1.698, 95%CI 1.219-2.365, P < 0.01), while bone, liver, distant lymph nodes and other metastases were not. We also found that surgical treatment significantly improved both OS and BCSS in BCBM patients with the HER2 + molecular subtypes and was beneficial to OS of the HR-/HER2- subtype. In contrast, surgery could not help BCBM patients with HR + /HER2- subtype improve their prognosis (OS: HR = 0.887, 95%CI 0.608-1.293, P = 0.510; BCSS: HR = 0.909, 95%CI 0.604-1.368, P = 0.630).
conclusionWe analyzed the clinical features of BCBM patients and constructed 4 machine-learning prognostic models to predict their survival. Our validation results indicate that these models should be highly reproducible in patients with BCBM. We also identified potential prognostic factors for BCBM patients and suggested that primary surgery might improve the survival of BCBM patients with HER2 + and triple-negative subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.