Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37344829›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2023

The clinical utility of rapid exome sequencing in a consanguineous population.

Dorota Monies, Ewa Goljan, Rapid Exome Consortium, Mirna Assoum, Muna Albreacan, Faisal Binhumaid, Shazia Subhani, Abdulmlik Boureggah, Mais Hashem, Firdous Abdulwahab and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Emerging significance of butyrylcholinesterase.World journal of experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Dorota MoniesDepartment of Clinical Genomics, Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ewa GoljanDepartment of Clinical Genomics, Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rapid Exome Consortium
Mirna AssoumDepartment of Clinical Genomics, Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muna AlbreacanDepartment of Clinical Genomics, Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal BinhumaidDepartment of Clinical Genomics, Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shazia SubhaniDepartment of Computational Science, Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmlik BoureggahDepartment of Clinical Genomics, Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mais HashemDepartment of Translational Genomics, Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, MBC-26, PO Box 3354, Riyadh, 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Firdous AbdulwahabDepartment of Translational Genomics, Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, MBC-26, PO Box 3354, Riyadh, 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Omar AbuyousefDepartment of Translational Genomics, Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, MBC-26, PO Box 3354, Riyadh, 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamad H TemsahDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Critical Care Unit, King Khalid University Hospital and College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad AlsohimeDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Critical Care Unit, King Khalid University Hospital and College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
James KelaherGeneral Corporate Consultancy Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed AbouelhodaDepartment of Computational Science, Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. mabouelhoda@kfshrc.edu.sa.
Brian F MeyerDepartment of Clinical Genomics, Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fowzan S AlkurayaDepartment of Translational Genomics, Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, MBC-26, PO Box 3354, Riyadh, 11211, Saudi Arabia. falkuraya@kfshrc.edu.sa.ORCID 0000-0003-4158-341X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical utility of exome sequencing is now well documented. Rapid exome sequencing (RES) is more resource-intensive than regular exome sequencing and is typically employed in specialized clinical settings wherein urgent molecular diagnosis is thought to influence acute management. Studies on the clinical utility of RES have been largely limited to outbred populations.

methodsHere, we describe our experience with rapid exome sequencing (RES) in a highly consanguineous population. Clinical settings included intensive care units, prenatal cases approaching the legal cutoff for termination, and urgent transplant decisions.

resultsA positive molecular finding (a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant that explains the phenotype) was observed in 80 of 189 cases (42%), while 15 (8%) and 94 (50%) received ambiguous (variant of uncertain significance (VUS)) and negative results, respectively. The consanguineous nature of the study population gave us an opportunity to observe highly unusual and severe phenotypic expressions of previously reported genes. Clinical utility was observed in nearly all (79/80) cases with positive molecular findings and included management decisions, prognostication, and reproductive counseling. Reproductive counseling is a particularly important utility in this population where the overwhelming majority (86%) of identified variants are autosomal recessive, which are more actionable in this regard than the de novo variants typically reported by RES elsewhere. Indeed, our cost-effectiveness analysis shows compelling cost savings in the study population.

conclusionsThis work expands the diversity of environments in which RES has a demonstrable clinical utility.

Indexed as

ConsanguinityExome SequencingFemaleHumansPhenotypePregnancyCritical careNovel gene-disease assertionRapid exomeReverse phenotyping

Identifiers

PMID37344829
PMCPMC10283251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.