Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37344804›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023

Targeted therapy using polymyxin B hemadsorption in patients with sepsis: a post-hoc analysis of the JSEPTIC-DIC study and the EUPHRATES trial.

Itsuki Osawa, Tadahiro Goto, Daisuke Kudo, Mineji Hayakawa, Kazuma Yamakawa, Shigeki Kushimoto, Debra M Foster, John A Kellum, Kent Doi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Endotoxic Septic Shock: Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Authors' reply to the comment from Uchida et al.Critical care (London, England) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Itsuki OsawaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 1130033, Japan.
Tadahiro GotoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke KudoDivision of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Mineji HayakawaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kazuma YamakawaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan.
Shigeki KushimotoDivision of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Debra M FosterSpectral Medical, Toronto, ON, Canada.
John A KellumSpectral Medical, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kent DoiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 1130033, Japan. kentdoi@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Tohoku University · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JPIridian Spectral Technologies (Canada) · CAOsaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences · JPUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Tokyo Health Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolymyxin B hemadsorption (PMX-HA) reduces blood endotoxin levels, but characteristics of patients with sepsis likely to benefit from PMX-HA are not well known. We sought to identify patient subgroups likely to benefit from PMX-HA.

methodsWe retrospectively identified 1911 patients with sepsis from a retrospective observational study in Japan (the JSEPTIC-DIC study) and 286 patients with endotoxemic septic shock from a randomized controlled trial in North America that restricted patients to those with high endotoxin activity (the EUPHRATES trial). We applied the machine learning-based causal forest model to the JSEPTIC-DIC cohort to investigate heterogeneity in treatment effects of PMX-HA on 28-day survival after adjusting for potential confounders and ascertain the best criteria for PMX-HA use. The derived criteria for targeted therapy by PMX-HA were validated using the EUPHRATES trial cohort.

resultsThe causal forest model revealed heterogeneity in treatment effects of PMX-HA. Since patients having higher treatment effects were more likely to have severe coagulopathy and hyperlactatemia, we identified the potential treatment targets of PMX-HA as patients with PT-INR > 1.4 or lactate > 3 mmol/L. In the EUPHRATES trial cohort, PMX-HA use on the targeted subpopulation (75% of all patients) was significantly associated with higher 28-day survival (PMX-HA vs. control, 68% vs. 52%; treatment effect of PMX-HA, + 16% [95% CI + 2.2% to + 30%], p = 0.02).

conclusionsAbnormal coagulation and hyperlactatemia in septic patients with high endotoxin activity appear to be helpful to identify patients who may benefit most from PMX-HA. Our findings will inform enrollment criteria for future interventional trials targeting patients with coagulopathy and hyperlactatemia.

Indexed as

HemoperfusionHyperlactatemiaSepsisShock, SepticAnti-Bacterial AgentsEndotoxinsHemadsorptionHumansObservational Studies as TopicPolymyxin BRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsEndotoxinsPolymyxin BEndotoxemiaEndotoxinHemadsorptionPolymyxin BSepsis

Identifiers

PMID37344804
PMCPMC10286480
OpenAlexW4381510384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.