Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37344801›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2023

Ability of the Analgesia Nociception Index variations to identify a response to a volume expansion of 250 mL of crystalloids in the operating room (REVANI): a prospective observational study.

Hugues de Courson, Grégoire Chadefaux, Benjamin Abel, Delphine Georges, Eric Verchere, Matthieu Biais

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04223414 (Ability of Changes in Analgesia Nociception Index to Assess the Stroke Volume Effects of a Volume Expansion of 250ml of Crystalloid in the Operating Room. REVANI Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04223414 completednot on this map

Ability of Changes in Analgesia Nociception Index to Assess the Stroke Volume Effects of a Volume Expansion of 250ml of Crystalloid in the Operating Room. REVANI Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2020 to 2020Enrolled66ConditionsVolume Expansion, Fluid ResponsivenessArmsAnalgesia Nociception Index (ANI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hugues de CoursonCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Grégoire ChadefauxCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Benjamin AbelCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Delphine GeorgesCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Eric VerchereCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Matthieu BiaisCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. matthieu.biais@chu-bordeaux.fr.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnalgesia Nociception Index (ANI) is a device based on analysis of the R-R interval and respiratory sinus arrhythmia to assess the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. The autonomic system is directly affected by load changes. Therefore, monitoring sympathetic tone and its change could theoretically allow tracking of load changes during volume expansion. The aim of the present study was to determine whether changes in ANI are able to track the increase in stroke volume caused by volume expansion (SV).

methodsThis prospective observational study included mechanically ventilated patients undergoing neurosurgery and benefiting from SV monitoring. Exclusion criteria were cardiac dysfunction, arrhythmias, beta-blockade therapy, and dysautonomia. SV was optimized by fluid administration of 250 ml of crystalloid fluid. A positive fluid increase was defined as a SV increase of 10% or more from baseline. Changes in SV and medium ANI (ANIm) were recorded before and 4 to 5 min after volume expansion.

resultsSixty-nine patients had 104 fluid challenges (36 positive and 68 negative). Volume expansion resulted in a greater ANI increase in responders than in nonresponders. The change in ANIm > 5 predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 68.4% (95% CI: 67.4% to 69.5%) and a specificity of 51.2% (95% CI: 50.1% to 52.3%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.546 (95% CI: 0.544 to 0.549) and appeared to be affected by remifentanil dose and baseline ANI.

conclusionChanges in ANIm induced by fluid challenge is not able to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing neurosurgery.

trial registrationClinical trial registration: NCT04223414.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaRespiration, ArtificialCrystalloid SolutionsFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHumansNociceptionOperating RoomsPainStroke VolumeCrystalloid SolutionsAnalgesia nociception indexCardiac outputNon-invasiveOperating roomVolume expansion

Identifiers

PMID37344801
PMCPMC10286348
OpenAlexW4381547713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.