ArticleBMC pediatrics2023
Determination of Optimal Vitamin D Dosage in Children with Cholestasis.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin D Status and Response to Calcifediol Supplementation in Term and Preterm Infants with Cholestasis.Nutrients · 2026Observational
- Vitamin D and Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Clinical Guidance for GVHD Management and Post-Transplant Outcomes.Cancers · 2026Review
- Determination of 25-Hydroxyvitamin DBiomedical chromatography : BMC · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVitamin D deficiency in patients with cholestasis is due to impaired intestinal vitamin D absorption, which results from decreased intestinal bile acid concentration. Patients with cholestasis usually do not achieve optimal vitamin D status when a treatment regimen for children without cholestasis is used. However, data on high-dose vitamin D treatment in patients with cholestasis are limited.
methodsThis study is a prospective study that included pediatric patients with cholestasis (serum direct bilirubin > 1 mg/dL) who had vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 25-OHD, < 20 ng/mL). In Phase 1, single-day oral loading of 300,000 IU (or 600,000 IU if weight ≥ 20 kg) of vitamin D2 was administered, followed by an additional loading if serum 25-OHD < 30 ng/mL, and 4-week continuation of treatment using a vitamin D2 dose calculated based on the increment of 25-OHD after first loading. In Phase 2, oral vitamin D2 (200,000 IU/day) was administered for 12 days, followed by 400,000 IU/day of vitamin D2 orally for another 8 weeks if serum 25-OHD < 30 ng/mL.
resultsPhase 1: Seven patients were enrolled. Three out of seven patients had a moderate increase in serum 25-OHD after loading (up to 20.3-27.2 ng/mL). These patients had conditions with partially preserved bile flow. The remaining four patients, who had biliary atresia with failed or no Kasai operation, had low increments of serum 25-OHD. Phase 2: Eleven patients were enrolled. Eight out of 11 patients had a moderate increase in serum 25-OHD after 200,000 IU/day of vitamin D2 for 12 days. Serum 25-OHD continued increasing after administering 400,000 IU/day of vitamin D2 for another 8 weeks, with maximal serum 25-OHD of 15.7-22.8 ng/mL.
conclusionVery high doses of vitamin D2 (200,000 and 400,000 IU/day) partly overcame poor intestinal vitamin D absorption and resulted in moderate increases in serum 25-OHD in pediatric patients with cholestasis, particularly when cholestasis was caused by uncorrectable bile duct obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.