ArticleBMC cancer2023
Mastectomy with Reconstruction Including Robotic Endoscopic Surgery (MARRES): a prospective cohort study of the Korea Robot-Endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group (KoREa-BSG) and Korean Breast Cancer Study Group (KBCSG).
Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04585074 (Prospective Cohort Study of Mastectomy With Reconstruction Including Robot Endoscopic Breast Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Cohort Study of Mastectomy With Reconstruction Including Robot Endoscopic Breast Surgery
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-port robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of robotic, conventional, and endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Pooled it
- Postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy with prosthesis breast reconstruction in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Endoscopic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Breast Surgery (MIBS) for Benign Breast Lesions: Our Experience of 80 Cases and Descriptive Comparison.European journal of breast health · 2026Article
- Early Oncologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Robotic and endoscopic minimally invasive breast surgery: a narrative synthesis on divergent global adoption and emerging trends.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Comparative Study of Mastectomy Using Conventional Techniques, Multiport and Single-Port Robotic Surgical Systems.Cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Cutting-edge trends in da Vinci single-port robotic approaches to breast surgery: a narrative review.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Review
- Minimal-access nipple-sparing mastectomy: current evidence, limitations, and future evaluation.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Article
- A retrospective comparison of clinical outcomes between endoscopic and open nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Intraoperative complications and prevention strategies in robot-assisted breast surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Global research trends in endoscopic breast surgery: a bibliometric analysis from 1994 to 2024.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- The first multicenter study of robot-assisted breast-conserving surgery: insights from the KoREa-BSG group.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Tumescence and Sharp Dissection Versus Electrocautery Dissection in Minimal-Access Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prosthesis Breast Reconstruction: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Consensus Statement on Robotic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy Expert Panel.Journal of breast cancer · 2025Article
- The role of robot-assisted mastectomy: promise, challenges, and evidence gaps.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Oncoplastic breast reconstruction with single-port laparoscopically harvested omental flap: insights from a ten-year tertiary center experience.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Development of a deep learning-based model for guiding a dissection during robotic breast surgery.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Reverse-sequence endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: an improvement of conventional minimal access breast surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRobotic nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM) has emerged as a new treatment option for breast cancer and risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) for women who have a high risk of pathogenic variants. Even though several studies have reported that RNSM is a feasible procedure, some argue that it should only be performed by specialized surgeons, and data on oncologic outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are limited. Recently, the United States Food and Drug Administration and several surgeons warned that robotic breast surgery should be performed only by specialized surgeons and recommended that the benefits, risks, and alternatives of all available treatment options be discussed with patients so they can make informed treatment decisions. The Korea Robot-Endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group (KoREa-BSG) has been established to evaluate, standardize, and teach this state-of-the-art procedure. We have designed a multicenter prospective cohort study entitled Mastectomy with Reconstruction Including Robot Endoscopic Surgery (MARRES) to report surgical, PRO, and oncologic outcomes.
methodsMARRES is a multi-institution cohort study prospectively collecting data from patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction. The patient inclusion criteria are adult women older than 19 with breast cancer or a high risk of breast cancer (patients with BRCA1/2, TP53, PALB2 mutations, etc.), who have scheduled therapeutic or RRM and want immediate reconstruction. Surgical outcomes, including pre- and postoperative photos, oncologic outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and PRO, are collected. The primary endpoints are postoperative complication rates within 30 postoperative days and the Clavien-Dindo grade of postoperative complications within 180 postoperative days. The secondary endpoints are 5-year postoperative recurrence-free survival and cancer incidence rate (for those who underwent RRM), patient satisfaction with reconstruction expectations preoperative (baseline) and results within 6 to 12 postoperative months, surgeon satisfaction with postoperative results in 6 postoperative months, and cost-effectiveness of the definitive surgery. Patient recruitment will be completed in April 2025, and the target number of enrolled patients is 2000. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence about the surgical outcomes, oncologic outcomes, and patient satisfaction with RNSM and endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), compared with conventional NSM.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04585074. Registered April 8, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.