SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2023
Extraperitoneal Versus Intraperitoneal Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative evaluation of reproductive organ-preserving versus standard radical cystectomy in female: a meta-analysis and systematic review of perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Extraperitoneal Open Radical Cystectomy: A New Standard in Frail Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer?Clinics and practice · 2024Article
- Lymphatic embolization for early post-operative lymphatic leakage after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes of extraperitoneal radical cystectomy (EPRC) and transperitoneal radical cystectomy (TPRC).
methodsA systematical search of multiple scientific databases was performed in September 2022. The systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the primary outcomes of interest were performed according to the PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (PROSPERO [CRD42022359322]).
resultsThe review and analysis included eight studies with 989 participants. No significant differences were found between EPRC and TPRC in terms of operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), hospital length of stay (LOS), or transfusion. A shorter exhaust time (standardized mean difference [SMD] - 0.59; 95 % confidence interval [CI] - 0.97 to 0.21; p = 0.002) and time to liquid intake (SMD, - 0.56; 95 % CI - 1.07 to 0.04; p = 0.03) were associated with EPRC. No clinically meaningful difference was observed in terms of postoperative infection, wound complications, postoperative genitourinary complications, late postoperative complications, early major complications, or late major complications. However, EPRC was related to lower incidences of early postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95 % CI 0.51-0.86; p = 0.002), gastrointestinal complications (OR 0.28; 95 % CI 0 0.17-0.46; p < 0.00001), and postoperative ileus (OR 0.38; 95 % CI 0.25-0.59; p < 0.0001). A higher incidence of postoperative lymphocele was associated with EPRC (OR 3.05; 95 % CI 1.13-8.25; p = 0.03). No clinically meaningful difference was found in terms of positive surgical margin (PSM), local recurrence, distant metastasis, or OS.
conclusionsAlthough EPRC had a higher incidence of lymphoceles than TPRC, it was found to have similar oncologic outcomes and fewer early complications, particularly in terms of postoperative gastrointestinal complications and ileus. These results suggest that EPRC is a safe option both functionally and oncologically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.