ReviewEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2023
Interventions to support patients with sharing genetic test results with at-risk relatives: a synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM).
Review in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trust and Privacy Concerns Among Cancer Survivors Who Did Not Visit a Research Website Offering Free Genetic Counseling Services for Families: Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Patients' perceptions and practices of informing relatives: a qualitative study within a randomised trial on healthcare-assisted risk disclosure.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Trial
- Why is family disclosure of genetic risk so difficult? A collaborative analysis of 685 rare-disease patient experiences.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- "Choosing the main character": healthcare professionals' attitudes towards counselling patients about risk disclosure to relatives in the era of mainstream cancer genetic testing.Familial cancer · 2025Article
- Addressing family communication in genetic counseling: A scoping review of process studies.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Using a behaviour-change approach to support uptake of population genomic screening and management options for breast or prostate cancer.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Genomic findings with familial implications: agenda setting in light of mainstreaming.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- Innovative Implementation Strategies for Familial Hypercholesterolemia Cascade Testing: The Impact of Genetic Counseling.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- An Ethical Approach to Genomic Privacy Preserving Technology Development.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2024Article
- The experience of receiving a letter from a cancer genetics clinic about risk for hereditary cancer.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Public attitudes challenge clinical practice on genetic risk disclosure in favour of healthcare-provided direct dissemination to relatives.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Why don't we all use genomic testing?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Whilst the finding of heritable susceptibility to disease was once relatively rare, mainstreaming of genetic testing has resulted in a steady increase. Patients are often encouraged to share their genetic test results with relevant relatives, but relatives may not receive this information, leaving them without knowledge of their own risk. Therefore, strategies to help communicate such information are important. This review aimed to explore the efficacy of existing interventions to improve the sharing of genetic test results. A synthesis without meta-analysis design was used. A systematic search of Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and AMED was conducted, and five studies were identified worldwide. Data were extracted for each study regarding study aim, participant characteristics, condition, intervention details, comparison, study duration, outcome measures, theory and behaviour change techniques used. Limited efficacy and application of theory was found. Knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy were not increased in any intervention. No gender differences in communication behaviour were encountered in interventions that recruited men and women. Two studies reported an evaluation of acceptability, which showed that the interventions were well received by patients and health professionals. No study reported the involvement of the target population in any phase of intervention development. Given the lack of health psychology-informed interventions in this area of clinical genetics, we recommend genetic health professionals, health psychologists and patients collaborate on all stages of future interventions that involve the cascading of genetic health information within families. We also provide guidance regarding use of theory and intervention elements for future intervention development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.