Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37344565›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A systematic approach to deep learning-based nodule detection in chest radiographs.

Finn Behrendt, Marcel Bengs, Debayan Bhattacharya, Julia Krüger, Roland Opfer, Alexander Schlaefer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Finn BehrendtInstitute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073, Hamburg, Germany. finn.behrendt@tuhh.de.
Marcel BengsInstitute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073, Hamburg, Germany.
Debayan BhattacharyaInstitute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073, Hamburg, Germany.
Julia KrügerJung Diagnostics GmbH, 22335, Hamburg, Germany.
Roland OpferJung Diagnostics GmbH, 22335, Hamburg, Germany.
Alexander SchlaeferInstitute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is a serious disease responsible for millions of deaths every year. Early stages of lung cancer can be manifested in pulmonary lung nodules. To assist radiologists in reducing the number of overseen nodules and to increase the detection accuracy in general, automatic detection algorithms have been proposed. Particularly, deep learning methods are promising. However, obtaining clinically relevant results remains challenging. While a variety of approaches have been proposed for general purpose object detection, these are typically evaluated on benchmark data sets. Achieving competitive performance for specific real-world problems like lung nodule detection typically requires careful analysis of the problem at hand and the selection and tuning of suitable deep learning models. We present a systematic comparison of state-of-the-art object detection algorithms for the task of lung nodule detection. In this regard, we address the critical aspect of class imbalance and and demonstrate a data augmentation approach as well as transfer learning to boost performance. We illustrate how this analysis and a combination of multiple architectures results in state-of-the-art performance for lung nodule detection, which is demonstrated by the proposed model winning the detection track of the Node21 competition. The code for our approach is available at https://github.com/FinnBehrendt/node21-submit.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleHumansLungRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37344565
PMCPMC10284921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.