Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37344482›Full record

ReviewNPJ microgravity2023

The value of a spaceflight clinical decision support system for earth-independent medical operations.

Brian K Russell, Barbara K Burian, David C Hilmers, Bettina L Beard, Kara Martin, David L Pletcher, Ben Easter, Kris Lehnhardt, Dana Levin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ microgravity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The human biology of spaceflight.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian K RussellAuckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. brian.russell@aut.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9960-1492
Barbara K BurianNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Mountain View, CA, USA.
David C HilmersNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6176-0132
Bettina L BeardNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Kara MartinNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Mountain View, CA, USA.
David L PletcherNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Ben EasterNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8077-8095
Kris LehnhardtNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6417-3208
Dana LevinNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5776-041X
Ames Research Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USJohnson Space Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As NASA prepares for crewed lunar missions over the next several years, plans are also underway to journey farther into deep space. Deep space exploration will require a paradigm shift in astronaut medical support toward progressively earth-independent medical operations (EIMO). The Exploration Medical Capability (ExMC) element of NASA's Human Research Program (HRP) is investigating the feasibility and value of advanced capabilities to promote and enhance EIMO. Currently, astronauts rely on real-time communication with ground-based medical providers. However, as the distance from Earth increases, so do communication delays and disruptions. Moreover, resupply and evacuation will become increasingly complex, if not impossible, on deep space missions. In contrast to today's missions in low earth orbit (LEO), where most medical expertise and decision-making are ground-based, an exploration crew will need to autonomously detect, diagnose, treat, and prevent medical events. Due to the sheer amount of pre-mission training required to execute a human spaceflight mission, there is often little time to devote exclusively to medical training. One potential solution is to augment the long duration exploration crew's knowledge, skills, and abilities with a clinical decision support system (CDSS). An analysis of preliminary data indicates the potential benefits of a CDSS to mission outcomes when augmenting cognitive and procedural performance of an autonomous crew performing medical operations, and we provide an illustrative scenario of how such a CDSS might function.

Identifiers

PMID37344482
PMCPMC10284846
OpenAlexW4381598863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.