Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37344255›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023

Beta resting-state functional connectivity predicts tactile spatial acuity.

Ryoki Sasaki, Sho Kojima, Naofumi Otsuru, Hirotake Yokota, Kei Saito, Hiroshi Shirozu, Hideaki Onishi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Functional Connectivity Is Dominated by Aperiodic, Rather Than Oscillatory, Coupling.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ryoki SasakiInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-Ku, Niigata City, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2758-0722
Sho KojimaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-Ku, Niigata City, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.
Naofumi OtsuruInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-Ku, Niigata City, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.
Hirotake YokotaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-Ku, Niigata City, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.
Kei SaitoInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-Ku, Niigata City, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.
Hiroshi ShirozuDepartment of Functional Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization Nishiniigata Chuo Hospital, 1-14-1 Masago, Nishi-Ku, Niigata City, Niigata 950-2085, Japan.
Hideaki OnishiInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-Ku, Niigata City, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1060-8795
Niigata University of Health and Welfare · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPThe University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tactile perception is a complex phenomenon that is processed by multiple cortical regions via the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). Although somatosensory gating in the S1 using paired-pulse stimulation can predict tactile performance, the functional relevance of cortico-cortical connections to tactile perception remains unclear. We investigated the mechanisms by which corticocortical and local networks predict tactile spatial acuity in 42 adults using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Resting-state MEG was recorded with the eyes open, whereas evoked responses were assessed using single- and paired-pulse electrical stimulation. Source data were used to estimate the S1-seed resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) in the whole brain and the evoked response in the S1. Two-point discrimination threshold was assessed using a custom-made device. The beta rs-FC revealed a negative correlation between the discrimination threshold and S1-superior parietal lobule, S1-inferior parietal lobule, and S1-superior temporal gyrus connection (all P < 0.049); strong connectivity was associated with better performance. Somatosensory gating of N20m was also negatively correlated with the discrimination threshold (P = 0.015), with weak gating associated with better performance. This is the first study to demonstrate that specific beta corticocortical networks functionally support tactile spatial acuity as well as the local inhibitory network.

Indexed as

TouchTouch PerceptionBrainBrain MappingMagnetoencephalographySomatosensory Cortexfunctional connectivitymagnetoencephalographyprimary somatosensory cortexsomatosensory gatingtactile spatial acuity

Identifiers

PMID37344255
PMCPMC10431746
OpenAlexW4381599040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.