SynthesisSaudi medical journal2023
Cardiothoracic ratio and left ventricular ejection fraction relationship: A meta-analysis study.
Synthesis in Saudi medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between the Cardiothoracic Ratio on Chest X-rays and the Respiratory Function in Patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases: a Cross-sectional Study.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Chest X-ray Findings and Prognostic Factors in Survival Analysis in Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis Patients: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the overall effect size, identify the study with the strongest effect size, and examine the age group with the strongest relationships between the variables.
methodsIn this study, a meta-analytical analysis was carried out by bringing together 13 studies from around the world examining the statistical relationships between cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Thus, it is hoped that the results will contribute to studies on the relationships between CTR and LVEF and bring a holistic view to these relationships. To determine CTR, studies were identified through a review of the literature, and those that reported a correlation between the variables under investigation were included in the analysis process. The date range of this study 01.11.2022-15.01.2023.
resultsAccording to the findings, when all the results were analysed together, the mean effect size for CTR and LVEF correlation was found to be r=-0.12. When all studies were considered separately, generally small negative correlations were observed between CTR and LVEF. It is possible to say that there is no publication bias in the studies.
conclusionThis study is a meta-analytic study combining 13 studies examining the statistical relationships between CTR and LVEF. The results of this study are expected to make a valuable contribution to the field of research on the relationship between CTR and LVEF, providing a more comprehensive understanding of these associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.