Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37343348›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2023

Characterizing the gut microbiome of broilers raised under conventional and no antibiotics ever practices.

Estefanía Novoa Rama, Matthew Bailey, Sanjay Kumar, Cortney Leone, Henk C den Bakker, Harshavardhan Thippareddi, Manpreet Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Estefanía Novoa RamaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Matthew BaileyDepartment of Poultry Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Sanjay KumarDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Cortney LeoneDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Henk C den BakkerDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; Center for Food Safety, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, USA. Electronic address: hcd82599@uga.edu.
Harshavardhan ThippareddiDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Manpreet SinghDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meat from broilers raised without the use of antibiotics is becoming increasingly popular among consumers. Consequently, interest in the microbial profiling of chickens produced under nonconventional practices is growing, however, research on this topic is lacking. The current study was designed to characterize the dynamics of gut microbial populations of broilers raised under conventional and no antibiotics ever (NAE) practices. Four commercial farms (2 conventional and 2 NAE) were included in this study. On each farm, cecal (n = 224) and ileal (n = 224) contents were collected from birds at different stages during the grow out of a single flock and following transportation to the processing facility. Cecal microbiota was dominated by the genera Escherichia and Enterococcus upon hatching in both conventional and NAE flocks, shifting with time toward predominantly Faecalibacterium and Bacteroides. The composition of cecal microbial communities of NAE broilers was different than that of conventional chickens (P ≤ 0.05). Conventional broilers harbored a rich, but less diverse cecal microbiota than NAE, while the ileal microbiota was primarily populated with genera previously named Lactobacillus, which exhibited a higher abundance in NAE broilers (P ≤ 0.05). In both production systems, the microbiota followed a similar temporal succession that was more evident in the ceca. Transportation to the processing plant impacted the microbial composition of the ileum (P ≤ 0.05), characterized by an increase in the relative abundance of Psychrobacter. Finally, differential abundance analysis showed a positive correlation between Campylobacter and Enorma within the cecum microbiota, and a negative correlation with Salmonella.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimal FeedAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCecumChickensAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibioticsconventionalmicrobiomepoultryproduction

Identifiers

PMID37343348
PMCPMC10404755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.