ArticleeLife2023
Expanding the stdpopsim species catalog, and lessons learned for realistic genome simulations.
Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The practice and promise of temporal genomics for measuring evolutionary responses to global change.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Pooled it
- Allelic gene conversion softens selective sweeps.Genetics · 2026Article
- ARGformer: learning on ancestral recombination graphs with transformers.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.Genetics · 2026Article
- On the use of generative models for demographic inference in malaria vectors from genomic data.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- A global map for introgressed structural variation and selection in humans.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Recent population history in Swedish cattle breeds.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Fast pairwise coalescence enables gene-resolution scans for recent selection in diverse human populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Highly efficient genotype compression leveraging genealogical relatedness.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Coalescence and translation: A language model for population genetics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Inference of population demographic history captures differing evolutionary signals based on the number of individuals in the dataset.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- AI solutions for evolutionary genomics of nonmodel species.Evolution letters · 2026Review
- Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The performance of genetic-constraint metrics varies significantly across the human noncoding genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Tracing the evolutionary histories of ultra-rare variants using variational dating of large ancestral recombination graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- SLiM 5: Eco-evolutionary Simulations Across Multiple Chromosomes and Full Genomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Moonshine.jl: a Julia package for genome-scale model-based ancestral recombination graph inference.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- TS-IBD: An efficient ancestral recombination graph-based identity by descent segment detection method.Human population genetics and genomics · 2026Article
- EGGS: Empirical Genotype Generalizer for Samples.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Accessible, Realistic Genome Simulation with Selection Using stdpopsim.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Simulation is a key tool in population genetics for both methods development and empirical research, but producing simulations that recapitulate the main features of genomic datasets remains a major obstacle. Today, more realistic simulations are possible thanks to large increases in the quantity and quality of available genetic data, and the sophistication of inference and simulation software. However, implementing these simulations still requires substantial time and specialized knowledge. These challenges are especially pronounced for simulating genomes for species that are not well-studied, since it is not always clear what information is required to produce simulations with a level of realism sufficient to confidently answer a given question. The community-developed framework stdpopsim seeks to lower this barrier by facilitating the simulation of complex population genetic models using up-to-date information. The initial version of stdpopsim focused on establishing this framework using six well-characterized model species (Adrion et al., 2020). Here, we report on major improvements made in the new release of stdpopsim (version 0.2), which includes a significant expansion of the species catalog and substantial additions to simulation capabilities. Features added to improve the realism of the simulated genomes include non-crossover recombination and provision of species-specific genomic annotations. Through community-driven efforts, we expanded the number of species in the catalog more than threefold and broadened coverage across the tree of life. During the process of expanding the catalog, we have identified common sticking points and developed the best practices for setting up genome-scale simulations. We describe the input data required for generating a realistic simulation, suggest good practices for obtaining the relevant information from the literature, and discuss common pitfalls and major considerations. These improvements to stdpopsim aim to further promote the use of realistic whole-genome population genetic simulations, especially in non-model organisms, making them available, transparent, and accessible to everyone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.