ArticleThe Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF2022
What Is Wrong with Monetary Sanctions? Directions for Policy, Practice, and Research.
Article in The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intersectional structural oppression as a fundamental cause: Reflections on implementing a medical-legal partnership project.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025Article
- Article
- Factoring in Family: Considerations of Parenthood in the Assessment, Enforcement, and Collection of Legal Financial Obligations (LFOs).The British journal of criminology · 2023Article
- Beyond "pains" and "gains": untangling the health consequences of probation.Health & justice · 2022Article
- Monetary Sanctions as Chronic and Acute Health Stressors: The Emotional Strain of People Who Owe Court Fines and Fees.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2022Article
- What Is Wrong with Monetary Sanctions? Directions for Policy, Practice, and Research.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2022Article
- Studying the System of Monetary Sanctions.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2022Article
- Incomparable Punishments: How Economic Inequality Contributes to the Disparate Impact of Legal Fines and Fees.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monetary sanctions are an integral and increasingly debated feature of the American criminal legal system. Emerging research, including that featured in this volume, offers important insight into the law governing monetary sanctions, how they are levied, and how their imposition affects inequality. Monetary sanctions are assessed for a wide range of contacts with the criminal legal system ranging from felony convictions to alleged traffic violations with important variability in law and practice across states. These differences allow for the identification of features of law, policy, and practice that differentially shape access to justice and equality before the law. Common practices undermine individuals' rights and fuel inequality in the effects of unpaid monetary sanctions. These observations lead us to offer a number of specific recommendations to improve the administration of justice, mitigate some of the most harmful effects of monetary sanctions, and advance future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.