Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37342851›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2023

Preservation of left colic artery in laparoscopic colorectal operation: The benefit challenge.

Fu-Cheng Liu, Jian-Ning Song, Ying-Chi Yang, Zhong-Tao Zhang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07098182 (Clinical Study Evaluating the Contribution of Preserving the Superior Left Colic Artery to the Vascularization of the Descending Colon Prior to Colorectal Anastomosis During Left-Sided or Rectal Resections for Colorectal or Ovarian Cancer.), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07098182 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Study Evaluating the Contribution of Preserving the Superior Left Colic Artery to the Vascularization of the Descending Colon Prior to Colorectal Anastomosis During Left-Sided or Rectal Resections for Colorectal or Ovarian Cancer. (Revascularisation Colique)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsRectal Cancer, Colon Cancer, Ovarian CancerArmsClamping and restauration of arterial blood of the inferior mesenteric artery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Elderly Rectal Cancer: An Updated Review.Current oncology reports · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fu-Cheng LiuGeneral Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Jian-Ning SongGeneral Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Ying-Chi YangGeneral Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Zhong-Tao ZhangGeneral Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China. zhangzht@ccmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer, there is controversy regarding whether the left colic artery (LCA) should be preserved at its origin.

aimTo investigate the prognostic significance of preservation of the LCA in colorectal cancer surgery.

methodsPatients were divided into two groups. The high ligation (H-L) technique (refers to ligation performed 1 cm from the beginning of the inferior mesenteric artery) group consisted of 46 patients, and the low ligation (L-L) technique (refers to ligation performed below the initiation of the LCA) group consisted of 148 patients. Operative time, blood loss, lymph nodes with tumor invasion, postoperative complications and recovery time, recurrence rate, and 5-year survival rate were compared between the two groups.

resultsThe average number of lymph nodes detected in postoperative pathological specimens was 17.4/person in the H-L group and 15.9/person in the L-L group. There were 20 patients (43%) with positive lymph nodes (lymph node metastasis) in the H-L group and 60 patients (41%) in the L-L group. No statistical differences were found between the groups. Complications occurred in 12 cases (26%) in the H-L group and in 26 cases (18%) in the L-L group. The incidences of postoperative anastomotic complications and functional urinary complications were significantly lower in the L-L group. The 5-year survival rates in H-L and L-L groups were 81.7% and 81.6%, respectively, and relapse-free survival rates were 74.3% and 77.1%, respectively. The two groups were similar statistically.

conclusionComplete mesenteric resection combined with lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery root while preserving the LCA is a beneficial surgical approach during laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

CancerComplete mesenteric resectionInferior mesenteric arteryLymphUrinary complications

Identifiers

PMID37342851
PMCPMC10277956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.