Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37342819›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2023

Epidemiology of C2 fractures and determinants of surgical management: analysis of a national registry.

Kristin Salottolo, Alejandro Betancourt, Kaysie L Banton, David Acuna, Ripul Panchal, David Bar-Or, Carlos H Palacio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Case Report of an Unstable C-spine Fracture in the Emergency Department.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The epidemiology of odontoid fractures: a study from the Swedish fracture register.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin SalottoloTrauma Research, Swedish Medical Center, Englewood, Colorado, USA.
Alejandro BetancourtTrauma Services, South Texas Health System McAllen, McAllen, TX, USA.
Kaysie L BantonTrauma Services, Swedish Medical Center, Englewood, CO, USA.
David AcunaTrauma Services, Wesley Medical Center, Wichita, Kansas, USA.
Ripul PanchalNeurosurgery, American Neurospine Institute, PLLC, Plano, Texas, USA.
David Bar-OrTrauma Research, Swedish Medical Center, Englewood, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3685-314X
Carlos H PalacioTrauma Services, South Texas Health System McAllen, McAllen, TX, USA.
Swedish Medical Center · USNeuroSpine Institute · USWesley Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Operative management of axis fractures (C2) usually depend on the stability and location of the break and individual patient characteristics. We sought to describe the epidemiology of C2 fractures and hypothesized that determinants for surgery would differ by fracture diagnosis. Methods: Patients with C2 fractures were identified from the US National Trauma Data Bank from January 1, 2017, to January 1, 2020. Patients were classified by C2 fracture diagnosis: odontoid type II, odontoid types I and III, and non-odontoid fracture (hangman's fracture or fractures through base of the axis). The primary comparison was C2 fracture surgery versus non-operative management. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent associations with surgery. Decision tree-based models were developed to identify determinants for surgery. Results: There were 38 080 patients; 42.7% had an odontoid type II fracture; 16.5% had an odontoid type I/III fracture; and 40.8% had a non-odontoid fracture. All examined patient demographics, clinical characteristics, outcomes, and interventions differed by C2 fracture diagnosis. Overall, 5292 (13.9%) were surgically managed (17.5% odontoid type II, 11.0% odontoid type I/III, and 11.2% non-odontoid; p<0.001). The following covariates increased odds of surgery for all three fracture diagnoses: younger age, treatment at a level I trauma center, fracture displacement, cervical ligament sprain, and cervical subluxation. Determinants of surgery differed by fracture diagnosis: for odontoid type II, age ≤80 years, a displaced fracture, and cervical ligament sprain were determinants; for odontoid type I/III, age ≤85 years, a displaced fracture, and cervical subluxation were determinants; for non-odontoid fractures, cervical subluxation and cervical ligament sprain were the strongest determinants for surgery, by hierarchy. Conclusions: This is the largest published study of C2 fractures and current surgical management in the USA. Odontoid fractures, regardless of type, had age and fracture displacement as the strongest determinants for surgical management, whereas associated injuries were determinants of surgery for non-odontoid fractures. Level of evidence: III.

Indexed as

geriatricsModels, Statisticalneurosurgeryspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID37342819
PMCPMC10277549
OpenAlexW4380996043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.