Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37342814›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2023

Acute reperfusion treatment and secondary prevention of cancer-related stroke: comprehensive overview and proposal of clinical algorithm.

Athina-Maria Aloizou, Lina Palaiodimou, Dimitra Aloizou, Efthimios Dardiotis, Ralf Gold, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Christos Krogias

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Long-term outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke patients with concomitant malignancy.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Athina-Maria AloizouDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791 Bochum, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9354-774X
Lina PalaiodimouSecond Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, 'Attikon' University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7757-609X
Dimitra AloizouDepartment of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Efthimios DardiotisDepartment of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Ralf GoldDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Georgios TsivgoulisSecond Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, 'Attikon' University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0640-3797
Christos KrogiasDepartment of Neurology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity of Thessaly · GRSt. Josef-Hospital · DEUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DEUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer-related stroke (CRS), referring to ischemic stroke occurring in cancer patients without other clear etiology, represents a clinical challenge, as it is associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes including high rates of recurrence and mortality. There are scarce international recommendations and limited consensus statements on CRS management. For this comprehensive overview, the available studies/reviews/meta-analyses on the use of acute reperfusion and secondary prevention treatments for cancer patients with ischemic stroke, focusing on antithrombotic agents, were collected and summarized. A practical management algorithm was designed per the available data. In short, acute reperfusion in the form of intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy appears to be safe in CRS and can be considered for eligible patients, though the functional outcomes are often poor, and mostly defined by the preexisting condition. Many patients carry indications for anticoagulation, in which case vitamin K antagonists are not preferred, while low-molecular weight heparins remain the treatment of choice; direct oral anticoagulants can be alternatively considered but are contraindicated for gastrointestinal malignancies. For patients without clear anticoagulation indications, no net benefit for anticoagulation compared to aspirin has been shown. Other targeted treatment options should be evaluated in an individualized approach, alongside the appropriate management of conventional cerebrovascular risk factors. Oncological treatment should be swiftly initiated/continued. In conclusion, acute CRS remains a clinical challenge, with many patients suffering recurrent stroke, despite preventive measures. More randomized-controlled clinical trials are urgently needed to pinpoint the most effective management options for this subset of stroke patients.

Indexed as

cancercancer-related strokehypercoagulabilityischemic strokemalignancystroketumor

Identifiers

PMID37342814
PMCPMC10278431
OpenAlexW4380985915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.