ArticleBiomedical optics express2023
Physics-guided neural network for tissue optical properties estimation.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interface geometry governs probe insertion mechanics and electrode deviation in layered brain-mimicking phantoms for deep brain stimulation.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
- Single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy system using unmodified clinical laser fibers for tissue optical property recovery for photodynamic therapy treatment planning.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Multi-layer self-calibrated algorithm for transabdominal fetal pulse oximetry: simulation andJPhys photonics · 2026Article
- Empowering photodynamic therapy with artificial intelligence: current trends and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Structured light imaging mesoscopy: detection of embedded morphological changes in superficial tissues.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Application of transfer learning for rapid calibration of spatially resolved diffuse reflectance probes for extraction of tissue optical properties.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Importance sampling-accelerated simulation of full-spectrum backscattered diffuse reflectance.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Principles, developments, and applications of spatially resolved spectroscopy in agriculture: a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Finding the optical properties of tissue is essential for various biomedical diagnostic/therapeutic applications such as monitoring of blood oxygenation, tissue metabolism, skin imaging, photodynamic therapy, low-level laser therapy, and photo-thermal therapy. Hence, the research for more accurate and versatile optical properties estimation techniques has always been a primary interest of researchers, especially in the field of bioimaging and bio-optics. In the past, most of the prediction methods were based on physics-based models such as the pronounced diffusion approximation method. In more recent years, with the advancement and growing popularity of machine learning techniques, most of the prediction methods are data-driven. While both methods have been proven to be useful, each of them suffers from several shortcomings that could be complemented by their counterparts. Thus, there is a need to bring the two domains together to obtain superior prediction accuracy and generalizability. In this work, we proposed a physics-guided neural network (PGNN) for tissue optical properties regression which integrates physics prior and constraint into the artificial neural network (ANN) model. With this method, we have demonstrated superior generalizability of PGNN compared to its pure ANN counterpart. The prediction accuracy and generalizability of the network were evaluated on single-layered tissue samples simulated with Monte Carlo simulation. Two different test datasets, the in-domain test dataset and out-domain dataset were used to evaluate in-domain generalizability and out-domain generalizability, respectively. The physics-guided neural network (PGNN) showed superior generalizability for both in-domain and out-domain prediction compared to pure ANN.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.