Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37342708›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2023

Functional visual tests to evaluate the effect of small astigmatism correction with toric contact lenses.

Pedro Gil, Alexandra Farcas, Antonio Benito, Juan Tabernero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pedro GilDepartamento de Electromagnetismo y Electrónica, Facultad de Química, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia 30100, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1070-8497
Alexandra FarcasDepartamento de Electromagnetismo y Electrónica, Facultad de Química, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia 30100, Spain.
Antonio BenitoLaboratorio de Óptica, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo (Edificio 34), Murcia 30100, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9419-4859
Juan TaberneroDepartamento de Electromagnetismo y Electrónica, Facultad de Química, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia 30100, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prescription of daily contact lenses does not often include a full astigmatic correction. We question here whether this full astigmatic correction (for low to moderate astigmatism) provides a substantial improvement in the overall visual performance compared to a more conservative approach based only on the prescription of spherical contact lenses. The visual performance of 56 contact lens neophytes divided in two contact lens fitting groups (toric versus spherical lens fit) was assessed using standard visual acuity and contrast sensitivity tests. A new set of functional tests simulating everyday tasks was also used. Results showed that subjects with toric lenses had significantly better visual acuity and contrast sensitivity than those with spherical lenses. Functional tests did not render significant differences between groups, which was explained by several factors like i) the visual demand of the functional tests, ii) the dynamic blur due to misalignments and iii) small misfits between the available and measured axis of the astigmatic contact lens.

Identifiers

PMID37342708
PMCPMC10278640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.