Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37342682›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2023

Automated colonoscopy withdrawal phase duration estimation using cecum detection and surgical tasks classification.

Thomas De Carvalho, Rawen Kader, Patrick Brandao, Juana González-Bueno Puyal, Laurence B Lovat, Peter Mountney, Danail Stoyanov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas De CarvalhoOdin Vision, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6980-542X
Rawen KaderDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9133-0838
Patrick BrandaoOdin Vision, London, UK.
Juana González-Bueno PuyalOdin Vision, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3820-604X
Laurence B LovatDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Peter MountneyOdin Vision, London, UK.
Danail StoyanovWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional & Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer with almost two million new cases worldwide. They develop from neoplastic polyps, most commonly adenomas, which can be removed during colonoscopy to prevent colorectal cancer from occurring. Unfortunately, up to a quarter of polyps are missed during colonoscopies. Studies have shown that polyp detection during a procedure correlates with the time spent searching for polyps, called the withdrawal time. The different phases of the procedure (cleaning, therapeutic, and exploration phases) make it difficult to precisely measure the withdrawal time, which should only include the exploration phase. Separating this from the other phases requires manual time measurement during the procedure which is rarely performed. In this study, we propose a method to automatically detect the cecum, which is the start of the withdrawal phase, and to classify the different phases of the colonoscopy, which allows precise estimation of the final withdrawal time. This is achieved using a Resnet for both detection and classification trained with two public datasets and a private dataset composed of 96 full procedures. Out of 19 testing procedures, 18 have their withdrawal time correctly estimated, with a mean error of 5.52 seconds per minute per procedure.

Identifiers

PMID37342682
PMCPMC10278633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.