Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37342604›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical physics

A Phantom Study on Feasibility of Manual Field-in-Field Clinical Implementation for Total Body Irradiation and Comparison of Midplane Dose with Different Bilateral TBI Techniques.

Bharath Pandu, D Khanna, P Mohandass, Rajadurai Elavarasan, Hima Ninan, T R Vivek, Saro Jacob

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bharath PanduDepartment of Applied Physics, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
D KhannaDepartment of Applied Physics, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
P MohandassDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fortis Hospital, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Punjab, India.
Rajadurai ElavarasanDepartment of Radiotherapy, Bangalore Baptist Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Hima NinanDepartment of Radiotherapy, Bangalore Baptist Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
T R VivekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tawam Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Saro JacobDepartment of Radiotherapy, Bangalore Baptist Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to implement a new treatment technique in total body irradiation (TBI) using the manual field-in-field-TBI (MFIF-TBI) technique and dosimetrically verifying its results with respect to compensator-based TBI (CB-TBI) and open field TBI technique. Materials and Methods: A rice flour phantom (RFP) was placed on TBI couch with knee bent position at 385 cm source to surface distance. Midplane depth (MPD) was calculated for skull, umbilicus, and calf regions by measuring separations. Three subfields were opened manually for different regions using the multi-leaf collimator and jaws. The treatment Monitor unit (MU) was calculated based on each subfield size. In the CB-TBI technique, Perspex was used as a compensator. Treatment MU was calculated using MPD of umbilicus region and the required compensator thickness was calculated. For open field TBI, treatment MU was calculated using MPD of umbilicus region, and the treatment was executed without placing compensator. The diodes were placed on the surface of RFP to measure the delivered dose and the results were compared. Results: The MFIF-TBI results showed that the deviation was within ± 3.0% for the different regions, except for the neck for which the deviation was 8.72%. In the CB-TBI delivery, the dose deviation was ± 3.0% for different regions in the RFP. The open field TBI results showed that the dose deviation was not within the limit ± 10.0%. Conclusion: The MFIF-TBI technique can be implemented for TBI treatment as no TPS is required, and laborious process of making a compensator can be avoided while ensuring that the dose uniformity in all the regions within the tolerance limit.

Indexed as

Compensator-based total body irradiationmanual field-in-field total body irradiationopen field total body irradiationtotal body irradiation

Identifiers

PMID37342604
PMCPMC10277292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.