ArticleInfection and drug resistance2023
The Impact of Monthly Prophylactic Antibiotics Use in Patients with Recurrent Cellulitis: A 20-Year Population-Based Cohort Study in a Medical Center.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Duration of protective effect after benzathine penicillin G prophylaxis for recurrent cellulitis: a 14-day window of efficacy.Infection · 2026Article
- Sustained benefit of compression therapy for preventing recurrent leg cellulitis: extended follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The vicious cycle of recurrent cellulitis ultimately results in a high risk of relapse, which facilitates the use of antibiotic prophylaxis with monthly intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) to prevent recurrence. However, several clinical situations hinder the guideline recommendations in daily practice. Therefore, intramuscular clindamycin has been used as an alternative in our institution for years. This study aims to elucidate the effectiveness of monthly intramuscular antibiotics in preventing further cellulitis recurrence and evaluate the applicability of intramuscular clindamycin as an alternative to BPG. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a medical center in Taiwan from January 2000 to October 2020. Adult patients with recurrent cellulitis were enrolled to receive monthly intramuscular antibiotic prophylaxis (including 1.2-2.4MU BPG or 300-600mg intramuscular clindamycin) or to be observed without prophylaxis. The decision to administer prophylaxis or observe was made at the discretion of the examining infectious disease specialists. Cox proportional-hazards regressions were performed to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and adjust for variables between groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival curves. Results: Enrollment in the study consisted of 426 patients, with 222 receiving BPG, 106 receiving intramuscular clindamycin, and 98 being observed without prophylaxis. Both types of antibiotics resulted in a significantly lower recurrence rate than observation alone (27.9% for BPG, 32.1% for intramuscular clindamycin, and 82.7% for observation, P < 0.001). After adjusting for multiple variables, antibiotic prophylaxis continued to significantly reduce the risk of cellulitis recurrence by 82% (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.26), by 86% (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.20) with BPG, and by 77% (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.38) with intramuscular clindamycin. Conclusion: Monthly intramuscular antibiotic prophylaxis was demonstrated to be effective in reducing cellulitis recurrence. Moreover, in the real-world practice, intramuscular clindamycin may serve as a reasonable alternative option to BPG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.