Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37342229›Full record

ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2023

Strengthening Tobacco 21 implementation and enforcement to reduce tobacco-related health disparities: A stakeholder engagement project.

Summer Woolsey, Athena K Ramos, Kaeli Samson, Delwyn Catley, Keyonna M King, Rob Crane, Hongying Daisy Dai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing Social Vulnerability and FDA Tobacco Retailer Compliance Inspections and Violations in Los Angeles County, CA (2021-2023).Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  3. Minimum Legal Sales Age for e-Cigarettes: a Qualitative Study on the Implementation of Model Policy Components.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gaps in Awareness of the United States Minimum Legal Age of E-Cigarette and Cigarette Sales: Implications for Public Health Messaging.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Summer WoolseyCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States.
Athena K RamosCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States.
Kaeli SamsonCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States.
Delwyn CatleyThe Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri.
Keyonna M KingCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States.
Rob CranePreventing Tobacco Addiction Foundation, Dublin, Ohio.
Hongying Daisy DaiCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States.

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHANG, YING · 2016 to 2025
$42.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs a part of a priority-setting stakeholder engagement project to strengthen the impact of the federal Tobacco 21 (T21) law, we conducted a qualitative study to solicit input from a nationwide sample of tobacco control stakeholders regarding the implementation, enforcement, and equity implications of the T21 law.

methodsFollowing the T21 policy evaluation guidance developed by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), we identified T21 experts in four domains: policy, evaluation, subject matter, and implementation from a national search of stakeholders (invitations, n=1279) to account for geographical variation. This study presents results from five focus groups conducted in December 2021 among stakeholders (n=31) with experience in T21 policy, evaluation, subject matter, and implementation.

resultsParticipating T21 stakeholders reported on eight themes from four main topic areas: 1) Implementation, 2) Enforcement, 3) Equity outcomes, and 4) Recommended changes from stakeholders. Stakeholders shared insights on both passive and active implementation methods used in their communities, and highlighted major barriers such as the absence of a standardized tobacco retail licensing mandate and insufficient resources. Regarding T21 enforcement, stakeholders believed that current deterrents for retail violations might not be effective. They noted that vape and tobacco shops and online sales of tobacco products are emerging major challenges in T21 enforcement. Stakeholders also discussed possible health inequities that may be exacerbated by heterogenous implementation of the T21 law.

conclusionsTo strengthen T21 and mitigate potential exacerbation of existing health inequities, greater alignment of federal, state, and local efforts to reduce heterogeneity of implementation and enforcement of the T21 law is recommended.

Indexed as

complianceenforcementequityfocus groupimplementationTobacco 21

Identifiers

PMID37342229
PMCPMC10277890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.