Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37342170›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences

Balancing read length and sequencing depth: Optimizing Nanopore long-read sequencing for monocots with an emphasis on the Liliales.

Gisel Y De La Cerda, Jacob B Landis, Evan Eifler, Adriana I Hernandez, Fay-Wei Li, Jing Zhang, Carrie M Tribble, Nisa Karimi, Patricia Chan, Thomas Givnish and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Chromosomal evolution, environmental heterogeneity, and migration drive spatial patterns of species richness inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gisel Y De La CerdaSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Section of Plant Biology and the L. H. Bailey Hortorium Cornell University Ithaca New York 14853 USA.
Jacob B LandisSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Section of Plant Biology and the L. H. Bailey Hortorium Cornell University Ithaca New York 14853 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5631-5365
Evan EiflerDepartment of Botany University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin 53706 USA.
Adriana I HernandezSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Section of Plant Biology and the L. H. Bailey Hortorium Cornell University Ithaca New York 14853 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7882-3427
Fay-Wei LiBTI Computational Biology Center Boyce Thompson Institute Ithaca New York 14853 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0076-0152
Jing ZhangBTI Computational Biology Center Boyce Thompson Institute Ithaca New York 14853 USA.
Carrie M TribbleSchool of Life Sciences University of Hawai'i, Mānoa Honolulu Hawai'i 96822 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7263-7885
Nisa KarimiDepartment of Botany University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin 53706 USA.
Patricia ChanDepartment of Botany University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin 53706 USA.
Thomas GivnishDepartment of Botany University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin 53706 USA.
Susan R StricklerBTI Computational Biology Center Boyce Thompson Institute Ithaca New York 14853 USA.
Chelsea D SpechtSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Section of Plant Biology and the L. H. Bailey Hortorium Cornell University Ithaca New York 14853 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7746-512X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premise: We present approaches used to generate long-read Nanopore sequencing reads for the Liliales and demonstrate how modifications to standard protocols directly impact read length and total output. The goal is to help those interested in generating long-read sequencing data determine which steps may be necessary for optimizing output and results. Methods: Four species of Results: Steps taken to maximize read length can decrease overall output. Notably, the number of pores in a flow cell is correlated with the overall output, yet we did not see an association between the pore number and the read length or the number of reads produced. Discussion: Many factors contribute to the overall success of a Nanopore sequencing run. We showed the direct impact that several modifications to the DNA extraction and cleaning steps have on the total sequencing output, read size, and number of reads generated. We show a tradeoff between read length and the number of reads and, to a lesser extent, the total sequencing output, all of which are important factors for successful de novo genome assembly.

Indexed as

Calochortusgenome sequencingLiliaceaeMinIONN50Oxford Nanoporeread length

Identifiers

PMID37342170
PMCPMC10278932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.