Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37342163›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences

Optimizing the lysis step in CTAB DNA extractions of silica-dried and herbarium leaf tissues.

S James Carey, L Ellie Becklund, Paige P Fabre, John J Schenk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. PhytoKeys · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S James CareyDepartment of Environmental and Plant Biology Ohio University Athens Ohio 45701-2979 USA.ORCID 0009-0001-4846-8919
L Ellie BecklundDepartment of Environmental and Plant Biology Ohio University Athens Ohio 45701-2979 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1334-991X
Paige P FabreDepartment of Environmental and Plant Biology Ohio University Athens Ohio 45701-2979 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8926-5640
John J SchenkDepartment of Environmental and Plant Biology Ohio University Athens Ohio 45701-2979 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4962-9101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premise: The use of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) is an effective and inexpensive method of extracting DNA from plants. The CTAB protocol is frequently modified to optimize DNA extractions, but experimental approaches rarely perturb a single variable at a time to systematically infer their effect on DNA quantity and quality. Methods and Results: We investigated how chemical additives, incubation temperature, and lysis duration affected DNA quantity and quality. Altering those parameters influenced DNA concentrations and fragment lengths, but only extractant purity was significantly affected. CTAB and CTAB plus polyvinylpyrrolidone buffers produced the highest DNA quality and quantity. Extractions from silica gel-preserved tissues had significantly higher DNA yield, longer DNA fragments, and purer extractants compared to herbarium-preserved tissues. Conclusions: We recommend DNA extractions of silica gel-preserved tissues that include a shorter and cooler lysis step, which results in purer extractions compared to a longer and hotter lysis step, while preventing fragmentation and reducing time.

Indexed as

cell lysiscetyltrimethylammonium bromideCTABDNA extractionmolecular biologyplant genetics

Identifiers

PMID37342163
PMCPMC10278933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.