Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37342160›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences

A comparison of freezer-stored DNA and herbarium tissue samples for chloroplast assembly and genome skimming.

Edward V McAssey, Cassidy Downs, Mitsuko Yorkston, Clifford Morden, Karolina Heyduk

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edward V McAsseySchool of Life Sciences University of Hawai'i at Mānoa Honolulu Hawai'i USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1568-3361
Cassidy DownsSchool of Life Sciences University of Hawai'i at Mānoa Honolulu Hawai'i USA.
Mitsuko YorkstonSchool of Life Sciences University of Hawai'i at Mānoa Honolulu Hawai'i USA.
Clifford MordenSchool of Life Sciences University of Hawai'i at Mānoa Honolulu Hawai'i USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6956-1138
Karolina HeydukSchool of Life Sciences University of Hawai'i at Mānoa Honolulu Hawai'i USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1429-6397

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premise: The use of DNA from herbarium specimens is an increasingly important source for evolutionary studies in plant biology, particularly in cases where species are rare or difficult to obtain. Here we compare the utility of DNA from herbarium tissues to their freezer-stored DNA counterparts via the Hawaiian Plant DNA Library. Methods: Plants collected for the Hawaiian Plant DNA Library were simultaneously accessioned as herbarium specimens at the time of collection, from 1994-2019. Paired samples were sequenced using short-read sequencing and assessed for chloroplast assembly and nuclear gene recovery. Results: Herbarium specimen-derived DNA was statistically more fragmented than freezer-stored DNA derived from fresh tissue, leading to poorer chloroplast assembly and overall lower coverage. The number of nuclear targets recovered varied mostly by total sequencing reads per library and age of specimen, but not by storage method (herbarium or long-term freezer). Although there was evidence of DNA damage in the samples, there was no evidence that it was related to the length of time in storage, whether frozen or as herbarium specimens. Discussion: DNA extracted from herbarium tissues will continue to be invaluable, despite being highly fragmented and degraded. Rare floras would benefit from both traditional herbarium storage methods and extracted DNA freezer banks.

Indexed as

cold storageDNA bankendemismfragmentationgenomicsHawaiian plantsherbarium

Identifiers

PMID37342160
PMCPMC10278930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.