ArticleApplications in plant sciences
A comparison of freezer-stored DNA and herbarium tissue samples for chloroplast assembly and genome skimming.
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comparison of physical preservation strategies for accurate characterization of the coffee fruit microbiome.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Geographical-Historical Analysis of the Herbarium Specimens Representing the Economically Important FamilyBiology · 2024Article
- Complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024Article
- Looking to the past to inform the future: What eDNA from herbarium specimens can tell us about plant-animal interactions.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
- A comparison of freezer-stored DNA and herbarium tissue samples for chloroplast assembly and genome skimming.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: The use of DNA from herbarium specimens is an increasingly important source for evolutionary studies in plant biology, particularly in cases where species are rare or difficult to obtain. Here we compare the utility of DNA from herbarium tissues to their freezer-stored DNA counterparts via the Hawaiian Plant DNA Library. Methods: Plants collected for the Hawaiian Plant DNA Library were simultaneously accessioned as herbarium specimens at the time of collection, from 1994-2019. Paired samples were sequenced using short-read sequencing and assessed for chloroplast assembly and nuclear gene recovery. Results: Herbarium specimen-derived DNA was statistically more fragmented than freezer-stored DNA derived from fresh tissue, leading to poorer chloroplast assembly and overall lower coverage. The number of nuclear targets recovered varied mostly by total sequencing reads per library and age of specimen, but not by storage method (herbarium or long-term freezer). Although there was evidence of DNA damage in the samples, there was no evidence that it was related to the length of time in storage, whether frozen or as herbarium specimens. Discussion: DNA extracted from herbarium tissues will continue to be invaluable, despite being highly fragmented and degraded. Rare floras would benefit from both traditional herbarium storage methods and extracted DNA freezer banks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.