Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37342155›Full record

ArticleStudies in mycology2022

Consolidation of

M Réblová, M Hernández-Restrepo, F Sklenář, J Nekvindová, K Réblová, M Kolařík

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in mycology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The ambrosial mycobiota ofIMA fungus · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. FourMycoKeys · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. An integrative re-evaluation of theStudies in mycology · 2025
    Article
  10. A new genus and species ofMycoscience · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. IMA fungus · 2025
    Article
  14. Studies in mycology · 2024
    Article
  15. Re-evaluation ofMycoKeys · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. New and Interesting Fungi. 6.Fungal systematics and evolution · 2023
    Article
  18. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M RéblováThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Taxonomy, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
M Hernández-RestrepoThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Taxonomy, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
F SklenářThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Taxonomy, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
J NekvindováInstitute of Clinical Biochemistry and Diagnostics, University Hospital, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
K RéblováThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Taxonomy, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
M KolaříkThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology, Laboratory of Fungal Genetics and Metabolism, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

35 new taxaChaetosphaeriaceaemolecular systematicsphialidic conidiogenesissoil fungispecies delimitation methodswood-inhabiting fungi

Identifiers

PMID37342155
PMCPMC10277272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.