ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2023
Utilizing novel recurrent laryngeal motor nerve conduction studies to characterize the aging larynx: A pilot study.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vocal Fold Atrophy in an Alzheimer's Disease Rat Model.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Superior Laryngeal Nerve Function in an Alzheimer's Disease Rat Model: A Pilot Study.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Effects of Aging on Superior Laryngeal Sensory and Motor Function in a Rat Model.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- The impact of synkinesis on voice restoration in idiopathic vocal fold paralysis patients with different disease courses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Utilizing novel recurrent laryngeal motor nerve conduction studies to characterize the aging larynx: A pilot study.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Age-related changes to the larynx are associated with dysphonia and contribute to reduced quality of life. This study utilizes recurrent laryngeal motor nerve conduction studies (rlMNCS) to determine if neurophysiologic changes occur in the aging larynx using an aging rat model. Study Design: Animal study. Methods: In vivo rlMNCS were performed in 10 young hemi-larynges (3-4 months) and 10 aged hemi-larynges (18-19 months) rats (Fischer 344 × Brown Norway F344BN). Recording electrodes were placed into the thyroarytenoid (TA) muscle through direct laryngoscopy. Recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) were directly stimulated with bipolar electrodes. Compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) were obtained. RLN cross-sections were stained with toluidine blue. Axon count, myelination, and g-ratio were quantified utilizing AxonDeepSeg analysis software. Results: rlMNCS were successfully obtained in all animals. Mean CMAP amplitude and negative durations in young rats were 3.58 ± 2.20 mV and 0.93 ± 0.14 mS (mean dif: 0.17; 95% CI: -2.21 to 2.54), respectively, and 3.74 ± 2.81 mV and 0.98 ± 0.11 mS (mean dif: 0.050; 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.17). No significant differences in onset latency or negative area were observed. Mean axon count in young rats (176 ± 35) was comparable to that in old rats (173 ± 31). Myelin thickness and g-ratio did not differ between groups. Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences in RLN conduction or axon histology between young and aged rats in this pilot study. This work provides a basis for future, adequately powered studies, and may lead to a tractable animal model to study the aging larynx. Level of Evidence: 5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.