Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37342078›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

A Machine Learning Approach for the Prediction of Testicular Sperm Extraction in Nonobstructive Azoospermia: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

Guillaume Bachelot, Ferdinand Dhombres, Nathalie Sermondade, Rahaf Haj Hamid, Isabelle Berthaut, Valentine Frydman, Marie Prades, Kamila Kolanska, Lise Selleret, Emmanuelle Mathieu-D'Argent and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Advances in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Male Infertility].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guillaume BachelotSaint Antoine Research Center, L'Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR 938, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4175-4816
Ferdinand DhombresLaboratory in Medical Informatics and Knowledge Engineering in e-Health, L'Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3246-8727
Nathalie SermondadeSaint Antoine Research Center, L'Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR 938, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7044-6935
Rahaf Haj HamidService de Biologie de La Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7045-1454
Isabelle BerthautService de Biologie de La Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3617-3769
Valentine FrydmanService d'Urologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0009-0008-4844-5064
Marie PradesService de Biologie de La Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1627-7840
Kamila KolanskaSaint Antoine Research Center, L'Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR 938, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7445-5345
Lise SelleretService d'Urologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0205-6828
Emmanuelle Mathieu-D'ArgentSaint Antoine Research Center, L'Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR 938, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7613-1619
Diane Rivet-DanonService de Biologie de La Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1005-7070
Rachel LevySaint Antoine Research Center, L'Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR 938, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2544-5711
Antonin LamazièreSaint Antoine Research Center, L'Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR 938, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0813-7370
Charlotte DupontSaint Antoine Research Center, L'Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR 938, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0402-4280
Sorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTesticular sperm extraction (TESE) is an essential therapeutic tool for the management of male infertility. However, it is an invasive procedure with a success rate up to 50%. To date, no model based on clinical and laboratory parameters is sufficiently powerful to accurately predict the success of sperm retrieval in TESE.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to compare a wide range of predictive models under similar conditions for TESE outcomes in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) to identify the correct mathematical approach to apply, most appropriate study size, and relevance of the input biomarkers.

methodsWe analyzed 201 patients who underwent TESE at Tenon Hospital (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris), distributed in a retrospective training cohort of 175 patients (January 2012 to April 2021) and a prospective testing cohort (May 2021 to December 2021) of 26 patients. Preoperative data (according to the French standard exploration of male infertility, 16 variables) including urogenital history, hormonal data, genetic data, and TESE outcomes (representing the target variable) were collected. A TESE was considered positive if we obtained sufficient spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. After preprocessing the raw data, 8 machine learning (ML) models were trained and optimized on the retrospective training cohort data set: The hyperparameter tuning was performed by random search. Finally, the prospective testing cohort data set was used for the model evaluation. The metrics used to evaluate and compare the models were the following: sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), and accuracy. The importance of each variable in the model was assessed using the permutation feature importance technique, and the optimal number of patients to include in the study was assessed using the learning curve.

resultsThe ensemble models, based on decision trees, showed the best performance, especially the random forest model, which yielded the following results: AUC=0.90, sensitivity=100%, and specificity=69.2%. Furthermore, a study size of 120 patients seemed sufficient to properly exploit the preoperative data in the modeling process, since increasing the number of patients beyond 120 during model training did not bring any performance improvement. Furthermore, inhibin B and a history of varicoceles exhibited the highest predictive capacity.

conclusionsAn ML algorithm based on an appropriate approach can predict successful sperm retrieval in men with NOA undergoing TESE, with promising performance. However, although this study is consistent with the first step of this process, a subsequent formal prospective multicentric validation study should be undertaken before any clinical applications. As future work, we consider the use of recent and clinically relevant data sets (including seminal plasma biomarkers, especially noncoding RNAs, as markers of residual spermatogenesis in NOA patients) to improve our results even more.

Indexed as

AzoospermiaInfertility, MaleAlgorithmsHumansMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSemenSpermatozoaazoospermiabiomedical informaticsinfertileinfertilitymachine learningmen's healthmodelpredictprediction modelsperm

Identifiers

PMID37342078
PMCPMC10337455
OpenAlexW4362714797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.