Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37342040›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

High-definition Cathodal Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mersedeh Bahr-Hosseini, Kambiz Nael, Gozde Unal, Marco Iacoboni, David S Liebeskind, Marom Bikson, Jeffrey L Saver, TESSERACT Trial Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03574038 (Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Stroke EaRly After Onset Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03574038 nacompletednot on this map

Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Stroke EaRly After Onset Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2018 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsStroke, AcuteArmsTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation, Sham Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Transcranial direct current stimulation is safe and feasible in hyperacute ischemic stroke (DICAST-SF trial).Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Overestimation of ischemic core on baseline MRI in acute stroke.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mersedeh Bahr-HosseiniDepartment of Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Kambiz NaelDepartment of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Gozde UnalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York (CCNY), New York.
Marco IacoboniDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
David S LiebeskindDepartment of Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Marom BiksonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York (CCNY), New York.
Jeffrey L SaverDepartment of Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
TESSERACT Trial Group
University of California, Los Angeles · USCity College of New York · USNeurobehavioral Systems · US

Funding

Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Stroke EaRly After onset Clinical Trial-2 (TESSERACT 2)UG3NS134619 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BAHR HOSSEINI, MERSEDEH, FENG, WUWEI · 2024 to 2025
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS UG3 NS134619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (C-tDCS) provides neuroprotection in preclinical models of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by inhibiting peri-infarct excitotoxic effects and enhancing collateral perfusion due to its vasodilatory properties. Objective: To report the first-in-human pilot study using individualized high-definition (HD) C-tDCS as a treatment of AIS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was sham controlled with 3 + 3 dose escalation design, and was conducted at a single center from October 2018 to July 2021. Eligible participants were treated for AIS within 24 hours from onset, had imaging evidence of cortical ischemia with salvageable penumbra, and were ineligible for reperfusion therapies. HD C-tDCS electrode montage was selected for each patient to deliver the electric current to the ischemic region only. Patients were followed for 90 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were feasibility, assessed as time from randomization to study stimulation initiation; tolerability, assessed by rate of patients completing the full study stimulation period; and safety, assessed by rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours. The efficacy imaging biomarkers of neuroprotection and collateral enhancement were explored. Results: A total of 10 patients with AIS were enrolled, 7 were randomized to active treatment and 3 to sham. Patient age was mean (SD) 75 (10) years old, 6 (60%) were female, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was mean (SD) 8 (7). Two doses of HD C-tDCS (1 milliamp [mA] for 20 minutes and 2 mA for 20 minutes) were studied. The speed of HD C-tDCS implementation was a median (IQR) 12.5 minutes (9-15 minutes) in the last 4 patients. Patients tolerated the HD C-tDCS with no permanent stimulation cessation. The hypoperfused region was reduced by a median (IQR) 100% (46% to 100%) in the active group vs increased by 325% (112% to 412%) in sham. Change in quantitative relative cerebral blood volume early poststimulation was a median (IQR) 64% (40% to 110%) in active vs -4% (-7% to 1%) sham patients and followed a dose-response pattern. Penumbral salvage in the active C-tDCS group was median (IQR) 66% (29% to 80.5%) vs 0% (IQR 0% to 0%) in sham. Conclusion and Relevance: In this randomized, first-in-human clinical trial, HD C-tDCS was started efficiently and well tolerated in emergency settings, with signals of beneficial effect upon penumbral salvage. These results support advancing HD C-tDCS to larger trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03574038.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAgedCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37342040
PMCPMC10285579
OpenAlexW4381470703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.