Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37341971›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of nuclear medicine2023

What radiolabeled FAPI pet can add in breast cancer? A systematic review from literature.

Laura Evangelista, Luca Filippi, Orazio Schillaci

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Comparison between [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  4. Per-patient Comparison of [Journal of Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. cGMP-compliant high-yield automated production of [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025
    Article
  8. Optimizing [EJNMMI research · 2025
    Article
  9. The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Comparison of diagnostic performance of [Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2025
    Article
  11. The wings of progress: technological and radiopharmaceutical innovations in nuclear medicine.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. International EANM-SNMMI-ISMRM consensus recommendation for PET/MRI in oncology.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura EvangelistaNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Via Giustiniani, 35128, Padua, Italy. laura.evangelista@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5955-9488
Luca FilippiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, Via Canova 3, 04100, Latina, Italy.
Orazio SchillaciDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Virgate, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To provide an overview of the current available data about FAPI PET in breast cancer patients, with a perspective point of view. A literature search for studies about FAPI PET in the last 5 years (from 2017 to January 2023) was carried out on MEDLINE databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar using the following keywords: "PET" AND "FAPI" AND "Breast Cancer" AND "Fibroblast imaging". The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist for diagnostic test studies was used for testing the quality of selected papers. 13 articles were selected, including 172 patients affected by breast cancer who underwent FAPI-based PET images. CASP checklist was used in 5/13 papers, demonstrating a general low quality. Different types of FAPI-based tracers were used. No difference in terms of FAPI uptake was reported based on the histopathological characteristics, such as immunohistochemistry and grading of breast cancer. FAPI demonstrated more lesions and yielded much higher tumor-to-background ratios than 2-[18F]FDG. Preliminary experiences with FAPI PET in breast cancer showed some advantages than the current available 2-[18F]FDG, although prospective trials are needed to further evaluate its diagnostic utility in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyFemaleFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaFluorodeoxyglucose F1868 Ga-FAPIBreast neo-plasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron emission tomography–computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID37341971
PMCPMC10345025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.