ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2023
Reproducibility of right ventricular function by longitudinal strain and other echocardiographic parameters in the ELSA-Brasil study.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reproducibility of Echocardiographic Measurements of Right Ventricular Function: Comparison Between TAPSE and TDI S'.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Review
- Left and Right Ventricular Strain in an Adult Brazilian Population from ELSA-Brasil Study: Reference Values and their Determinants.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Right ventricular (RV) free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS), and four-chamber longitudinal strain (RV4CLS) using speckle tracking echocardiography have demonstrated increased accuracy and discrimination to measure right ventricular function in different clinical conditions. Reproducibility data of these measures are scarce and mainly tested in small or reference populations. The main objective of this study was to investigate their reproducibility, and of other traditional RV parameters, from unselected participants of a large cohort study. RV strain reproducibility was analyzed using echocardiographic images of 50 participants from a randomly selected sample from The ELSA-Brasil Cohort. Images were acquired and analyzed following the study protocols. The mean RVFWLS was - 26.9 ± 2.6% and the mean RV4CLS was - 24.4 ± 1.9%. The intra-observer reproducibility parameters of RVFWLS demonstrated a coefficient of variation (CV) of 5.1% and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [95%CI] 0.78[0.67-0.89]), and for RV4CLS were CV = 5.1% and ICC = 0.78[0.67-0.89]. Reproducibility for RV fractional area change was CV = 12.1%; ICC = 0.66 [0.50-0.81] and for RV basal diameter was CV = 6.3%; ICC = 0.82 [0.73-0.91]. The inter-observer reproducibility for RVFWLS was CV = 8.3%; ICC 0.54[0.34-0.74] and for RV4CLS, CV = 6.3%; ICC = 0.53[0.34-0.73], following the same pattern among conventional RV parameters. We found adequate reproducibility of RV longitudinal strain parameters. This information is relevant for the long-term follow-up of cohort participants and reinforces the utility of RV longitudinal strain as a tool to monitor subclinical changes in RV systolic function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.