Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37341929›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2023

Investigating the implant position reproducibility of optical impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner and 3D-printed models fabricated using an intraoral scanner.

Maya Iwamoto, Wataru Atsuta, Yasuhide Kaneko, Junnosuke Ito, Takeshi Kanno, Takahiro Murakami, Jyoji Tanaka

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maya IwamotoClinical Implant Society of Japan, 1-43-9, Komagome, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 170-0003, Japan.
Wataru AtsutaClinical Implant Society of Japan, 1-43-9, Komagome, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 170-0003, Japan.
Yasuhide KanekoClinical Implant Society of Japan, 1-43-9, Komagome, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 170-0003, Japan.
Junnosuke ItoClinical Implant Society of Japan, 1-43-9, Komagome, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 170-0003, Japan.
Takeshi KannoClinical Implant Society of Japan, 1-43-9, Komagome, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 170-0003, Japan.
Takahiro MurakamiClinical Implant Society of Japan, 1-43-9, Komagome, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 170-0003, Japan. m.19871229@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3482-4617
Jyoji TanakaClinical Implant Society of Japan, 1-43-9, Komagome, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 170-0003, Japan.
Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to examine the effect of the size of the intraoral scanning area on implant position reproducibility and compare the implant position reproducibility of plaster models fabricated using the silicone impression technique, the digital model of an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional (3D)-printed models fabricated using an intraoral scanner.

methodsScanbodies were attached to an edentulous model with six implants (master model) and were scanned using a dental laboratory scanner to obtain basic data. The plaster model was fabricated using the open-tray method (IMPM; n = 5). The master model was then scanned in various implant areas using an intraoral scanner to obtain data (IOSM; n = 5); the scanning data of six scanbodies were used to fabricate the 3D-printed models (3DPM; n = 5) using a 3D printer. Scanbodies were attached to the implant analogs of the IMPM and 3DPM models and data were obtained using a dental laboratory scanner. The basic data and IMPM, IOSM, and 3DPM data were superimposed to calculate the concordance rate of the scanbodies.

resultsThe concordance rate of intraoral scanning decreased as the number of scanbodies increased. Significant differences were observed between the IMPM and IOSM data, and between the IOSM and 3DPM data; however, the IMPM and 3DPM data did not differ significantly.

conclusionsThe implant position reproducibility of the intraoral scanner decreased with an increase in the scanning area. However, ISOM and 3DPM may provide higher implant position reproducibility than plaster models fabricated using IMPM.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsDental Impression TechniqueModels, DentalPrinting, Three-DimensionalReproducibility of ResultsDental Implants3D printerFull-arch implant casesImplant position reproducibilityIntraoral scannerPlaster model

Identifiers

PMID37341929
PMCPMC10284752
OpenAlexW4381470277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.