Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37341889›Full record

ArticleMolecular biotechnology2025

Effect of Photoperiod and White LED on Biomass Growth and Protein Production by Spirulina.

Obaid Bhat, Yuwalee Unpaprom, Rameshprabu Ramaraj

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Obaid BhatSchool of Renewable Energy, Maejo University, Chiang Mai, 50290, Thailand.
Yuwalee UnpapromSustainable Resources and Sustainable Engineering Research Lab, Maejo University, Chiang Mai, 50290, Thailand.
Rameshprabu RamarajSchool of Renewable Energy, Maejo University, Chiang Mai, 50290, Thailand. rrameshprabu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4141-9313

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The constant increase in demand for food, valued bio-based compounds and energy demand has prompted the development of innovative and sustainable resources. New technologies and strategies must be implemented to boost microalgae biomass production, such as using different photoperiods along with (LED) light-emitting diodes to stimulate biomass production and boost profits. This work investigates the cultivation of blue-green microalgae (Spirulina) in a closed lab condition. The current study aims to boost Spirulina biomass production by creating ideal growth conditions using different photoperiods (12:12; 10:14; 14:10) light/dark with a constant light intensity of 2000 lx from White LED lights. The obtained optical density and protein content was highest for photoperiod 14L: 10D and values were 0.280 OD, with a protein content of 23.44 g/100 g, respectively. This study is a crucial first step in identifying the best photoperiod conditions to help S. platensis produce more biomass. The study results showed that increasing photoperiod for S. platensis farming can improve the quality and amount of biomass generated in those cultures without negatively affecting growth.

Indexed as

PhotoperiodSpirulinaBiomassLightMicroalgaeBiomassLEDPhotoperiodSpirulina

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.