Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37341887›Full record

ReviewDrugs2023

Concizumab: First Approval.

Susan J Keam

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Laboratory Challenges in the Era of Novel Haemophilia Therapies.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. New therapies in hemophilia: extend the half-life, mimic, or rebalance?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  5. The Mirage of Factor Equivalence: Examining the Complexities of Non-Factor Therapies in Haemophilia.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Trends in Treatment of Severe Haemophilia and Impact on Inhibitor Assessment by the EUHASS Registry.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Contemporary approaches to treat people with hemophilia: what's new and what's not?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan J KeamSpringer Nature, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand. dru@adis.com.
Springer Nature (New Zealand) · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concizumab (Alhemo™), a subcutaneously administered humanised monoclonal IgG4 antibody against tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), binds to the Kunitz-2 domain of TFPI and prevents TFPI from binding to activated Factor X. Concizumab is being developed by Novo Nordisk for the treatment of hemophilia A and B with and without inhibitors. In March 2023, concizumab was approved in Canada for the treatment of adolescent and adult patients (12 years of age or older) with hemophilia B who have FIX inhibitors and require routine prophylaxis to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of concizumab leading to this first approval for the treatment of hemophilia B.

Indexed as

Hemophilia AHemophilia BAdolescentAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedconcizumab

Identifiers

PMID37341887
OpenAlexW4381470146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.