Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37341838›Full record

ArticleApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2023

Clinical Value of Using Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Before Elective CT Coronary Angiography to Reduce Heart Rate and the Need for Beta-Blockers.

Patrick Langguth, Carmen Wolf, Sam Sedaghat, Monika Huhndorf, Johanne Frank, Marcus Both, Olav Jansen, Mona Salehi Ravesh, Annett Lebenatus

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Patrick Langguth *Department for Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany. Patrick.Langguth@uksh.de.
Carmen Wolf *Department for Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Sam SedaghatDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Monika HuhndorfDepartment for Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Johanne FrankDepartment for Internal Medicine III, Molecular Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Marcus BothDepartment for Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Olav JansenDepartment for Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Mona Salehi RaveshDepartment for Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Annett LebenatusDepartment for Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The value of biofeedback before elective coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to reduce patients' heart rates (HR) was investigated in the current work. Sixty patients who received CCTA to exclude coronary artery disease were included in our study and separated into two groups: with biofeedback (W-BF) and without biofeedback (WO-BF). The W-BF group used a biofeedback device for 15 min before CCTA. HR was determined in each patient at four measurement time points (MTP): during the pre-examination interview (MTP1), positioning on the CT patient table before CCTA (MTP2), during CCTA image acquisition (MTP3), and after completing CCTA (MTP4). If necessary, beta-blockers were administered in both groups after MTP2 until a HR of less than 65 bpm was achieved. Two board-certified radiologists subsequently assessed the image quality and analyzed the findings. Overall, the need for beta-blockers was significantly lower in patients in the W-BF group than the WO-BF group (p = 0.032). In patients with a HR of 81-90, beta-blockers were not required in four of six cases in the W-BF group, whereas in the WO-BF group all patients needed beta-blockers (p = 0.03). The amount of HR reduction between MTP1 and MTP2 was significantly higher in the W-BF compared to the WO-BF group (p = 0.028). There was no significant difference between the W-BF and WO-BF groups regarding image quality (p = 0.179). By using biofeedback prior to elective CCTA, beta-blocker use could be decreased without compromising CT image quality and analysis, especially in patients with an initial HR of 81-90 bpm.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary AngiographyHeart RateHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedBeta-blockerBiofeedbackComputed tomography coronary angiographyHeart rate variability

Identifiers

PMID37341838
PMCPMC10581922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.